},
        "irish_lowercase": {
          "type":       "lowercase",

Và việc thêm gợi ý kiểu dữ liệu không làm thay đổi những gì xảy ra so với khi chưa thêm chúng.

But now, imagine you are again in the middle of creating that function, but with type hints.

Tại cùng một điểm, bạn thử kích hoạt autocomplete với `Ctrl+Space` và bạn thấy:

<img src="/img/python-types/image02.png">

Với cái đó, bạn có thể cuộn, nhìn thấy các lựa chọn, cho đến khi bạn tìm thấy một "tiếng chuông":

  Hasher putBoolean(boolean b);

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Override
  Hasher putChar(char c);

  /**
   * Equivalent to processing each {@code char} value in the {@code CharSequence}, in order. In
   * other words, no character encoding is performed; the low byte and high byte of each {@code
   * char} are hashed directly (in that order). The input must not be updated while this method is
   * in progress.
   *

  // original character value.
  @VisibleForTesting
  static char[][] createReplacementArray(Map<Character, String> map) {
    checkNotNull(map); // GWT specific check (do not optimize)
    if (map.isEmpty()) {
      return EMPTY_REPLACEMENT_ARRAY;
    }
    char max = max(map.keySet());
    char[][] replacements = new char[max + 1][];
    for (Character c : map.keySet()) {

      }
    },
    // It really seems like this should be faster than TO_BYTE_ARRAY_NEW_STRING.  But it just isn't
    // my best guess is that the jdk authors have spent more time optimizing that callpath than this
    // one. (StringCoding$StringDecoder vs. StreamDecoder).  StringCoding has a ton of special cases
    // theoretically we could duplicate all that logic here to try to beat 'new String' or at least
    // come close.

    }
  }

  public void testUtf8() {
    char[] charsA = new char[128];
    char[] charsB = new char[128];

    for (int i = 0; i < charsA.length; i++) {
      if (i < 100) {
        charsA[i] = 'a';
        charsB[i] = 'a';
      } else {
        // Both two-byte characters, but must be different
        charsA[i] = (char) (0x0180 + i);
        charsB[i] = (char) (0x0280 + i);
      }
    }

        }
    }

    /**
     * Test that password comparison is constant-time by comparing execution times
     * for passwords that differ at different positions.
     */
    @Test
    public void testConstantTimePasswordComparison() throws Exception {
        char[] basePassword = "supersecretpassword123456789".toCharArray();
        char[] diffAtStart = "Xupersecretpassword123456789".toCharArray();

   */
  private static char[] growBuffer(char[] dest, int index, int size) {
    if (size < 0) { // overflow - should be OutOfMemoryError but GWT/j2cl don't support it
      throw new AssertionError("Cannot increase internal buffer any further");
    }
    char[] copy = new char[size];
    if (index > 0) {
      System.arraycopy(dest, 0, copy, 0, index);
    }

   */
  private static char[] growBuffer(char[] dest, int index, int size) {
    if (size < 0) { // overflow - should be OutOfMemoryError but GWT/j2cl don't support it
      throw new AssertionError("Cannot increase internal buffer any further");
    }
    char[] copy = new char[size];
    if (index > 0) {
      System.arraycopy(dest, 0, copy, 0, index);
    }

      // Start with "%--" and fill in the blanks
      char[] dest = new char[3];
      dest[0] = '%';
      dest[2] = upperHexDigits[cp & 0xF];
      dest[1] = upperHexDigits[cp >>> 4];
      return dest;
    } else if (cp <= 0x7ff) {
      // Two byte UTF-8 characters [cp >= 0x80 && cp <= 0x7ff]
      // Start with "%--%--" and fill in the blanks
      char[] dest = new char[6];
      dest[0] = '%';
      dest[3] = '%';