import java.util.TreeSet;

/**
 * Provides supporting data for performance notes in the documentation of {@link
 * Ordering#sortedCopy} and {@link Ordering#immutableSortedCopy}, as well as for automated code
 * suggestions.
 *
 */
public class SortedCopyBenchmark {
  @Param({"1", "10", "1000", "1000000"})
  int size; // logarithmic triangular

  @Param boolean mutable;

  @Param InputOrder inputOrder;

import java.util.TreeSet;

/**
 * Provides supporting data for performance notes in the documentation of {@link
 * Ordering#sortedCopy} and {@link Ordering#immutableSortedCopy}, as well as for automated code
 * suggestions.
 *
 */
public class SortedCopyBenchmark {
  @Param({"1", "10", "1000", "1000000"})
  int size; // logarithmic triangular

  @Param boolean mutable;

  @Param InputOrder inputOrder;

/// tip

You can <a href="https://help.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-issues-and-pull-requests/commenting-on-a-pull-request" class="external-link" target="_blank">add comments with change suggestions</a> to existing pull requests.

/// tip

Vous pouvez <a href="https://help.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-issues-and-pull-requests/commenting-on-a-pull-request" class="external-link" target="_blank">ajouter des commentaires avec des suggestions de changement</a> aux pull requests existantes.

 *
 * <p>For added safety, it is common for IPv6 network operators to filter all packets where either
 * the source or destination address appears to be a "compat" or "mapped" address. Filtering
 * suggestions usually recommend discarding any packets with source or destination addresses in the
 * invalid range {@code ::/3}, which includes both of these bizarre address formats. For more

 *
 * <p>For added safety, it is common for IPv6 network operators to filter all packets where either
 * the source or destination address appears to be a "compat" or "mapped" address. Filtering
 * suggestions usually recommend discarding any packets with source or destination addresses in the
 * invalid range {@code ::/3}, which includes both of these bizarre address formats. For more

        method signatures would look like, for example, even if the method and class names are still
        in flux. This can make the feature you're suggesting much clearer to us.

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: (Optional) What would the method signatures for your feature look like?
      placeholder: |
        e.g.,

// http://www.domaine.km/documents/charte.doc
km
org.km
nom.km
gov.km
prd.km
tm.km
edu.km
mil.km
ass.km
com.km
// These are only mentioned as proposed suggestions at domaine.km, but
// https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.km says they're available for registration:
coop.km
asso.km
presse.km
medecin.km
notaires.km
pharmaciens.km
veterinaire.km
gouv.km

	if !labels.HasCanonicalServiceName(pod.Labels) {
		fmt.Fprintf(writer, "Suggestion: add required service name label for Istio telemetry. "+
			"See %s.\n", url.DeploymentRequirements)
	}
	if !labels.HasCanonicalServiceRevision(pod.Labels) {
		fmt.Fprintf(writer, "Suggestion: add required service revision label for Istio telemetry. "+
			"See %s.\n", url.DeploymentRequirements)
	}
}

			}
			if enrollNamespace {
				if !overwrite && hasWaypoint {
					// we don't want to error on the user when they don't explicitly overwrite namespaced Waypoints,
					// we just warn them and provide a suggestion
					fmt.Fprintf(cmd.OutOrStdout(), "Warning: namespace (%s) already has an enrolled Waypoint. Consider "+
						"adding the `"+"--overwrite"+"` flag to your apply command.\n", ns)
					return nil
				}