hadde
hun
nå
over
da
ved
fra
du
ut
sin
dem
oss
opp
man
kan
hans
hvor
eller
hva
skal
selv
sjøl
her
alle
vil
bli
ble
blei
blitt
kunne
inn
når
være
kom
noen
noe
ville
dere
som
deres
kun
ja
etter
ned
skulle
denne
for
deg
si
sine
sitt
mot
å
meget
hvorfor
dette
disse
uten

havde
ham
hun
nu
over
da
fra
du
ud
sin
dem
os
op
man
hans
hvor
eller
hvad
skal
selv
her
alle
vil
blev
kunne
ind
når
være
dog
noget
ville
jo
deres
efter
ned
skulle
denne
end
dette
mit
også
under
have
dig
anden
hende
mine
alt
meget
sit
sine
vor
mod
disse
hvis
din
nogle
hos

"har", "om", "vi", "min", "havde", "ham", "hun", "nu", "over", "da", "fra", "du", "ud", "sin", "dem", "os", "op", "man", "hans", "hvor", "eller", "hvad", "skal", "selv", "her", "alle", "vil", "blev", "kunne", "ind", "når", "være", "dog", "noget", "ville", "jo", "deres", "efter", "ned", "skulle", "denne", "end", "dette", "mit", "også", "under", "have", "dig", "anden", "hende", "mine", "alt", "meget", "sit", "sine", "vor", "mod", "disse", "hvis", "din", "nogle", "hos", "blive", "mange", "ad", "bliver",...

meine
meinem
meinen
meiner
meines
mit
muss
musste
nach
nicht
nichts
noch
nun
nur
ob
oder
ohne
sehr
sein
seine
seinem
seinen
seiner
seines
selbst
sich
sie
ihnen
sind
so
solche
solchem
solchen
solcher
solches
soll
sollte
sondern
sonst
über
um
und
uns
unse
unsem
unsen
unser

 */
public abstract class StringUtil {

    /**
     * Do not instantiate.
     */
    protected StringUtil() {
    }

    /**
     * A system line separator.
     */
    public static final String RETURN_STRING = System.getProperty("line.separator");

    /**
     * An empty string <code>""</code>.
     */
    public static final String EMPTY = "";

    /**
     * An empty array of strings.

   * however that is fine since the correctness is based on the atomic state in our base class. The
   * initial write to timer is never definitely visible to Fire.run since it is assigned after
   * SES.schedule is called. Therefore Fire.run has to check for null. However, it should be visible
   * if Fire.run is called by delegate.addListener since addListener is called after the assignment

   * them under J2CL—or, as an unfortunate side effect, under GWT. We do still give the fields
   * themselves their proper values under GWT, since GWT's EnumMap does need the Class instance.
   *
   * Note that sometimes these fields *do* have correct values under J2CL: They will if the caller
   * calls `create(Foo.class)`, rather than `create(map)`. That's fine; we just shouldn't rely on
   * it.
   */

data.offsets.popper[side] -=\n      popper[side] - (reference[opSide] - arrowElementSize);\n  }\n  // bottom/right side\n  if (reference[side] + arrowElementSize > popper[opSide]) {\n    data.offsets.popper[side] +=\n      reference[side] + arrowElementSize - popper[opSide];\n  }\n  data.offsets.popper = getClientRect(data.offsets.popper);\n\n  // compute center of the popper\n  const center = reference[side] + reference[len] / 2 - arrowElementSize / 2;\n\n  // Compute the sideValue using the updated popper...

   *
   * @throws IOException if an I/O error occurs while writing to this sink
   */
  public void writeLines(Iterable<? extends CharSequence> lines) throws IOException {
    writeLines(lines, System.getProperty("line.separator"));
  }

  /**
   * Writes the given lines of text to this sink with each line (including the last) terminated with
   * the given line separator.
   *

 * references. It would not make sense to consider {@code null} and a non-null reference to be
 * "different representations of the same information", since one is distinguishable from
 * <i>missing</i> information and the other is not. The {@link #convert} method handles this null
 * behavior for all converters; implementations of {@link #doForward} and {@link #doBackward} are