Call             Type T            Result

make(T, n)       slice             slice of type T with length n and capacity n
make(T, n, m)    slice             slice of type T with length n and capacity m

make(T)          map               map of type T
make(T, n)       map               map of type T with initial space for approximately n elements

make(T)          channel           unbuffered channel of type T

		var fw fileWriter
		switch maker := v.maker.(type) {
		case makeReg:
			fw = &regFileWriter{w, maker.size}
			wantStr = maker.wantStr
		case makeSparse:
			if !validateSparseEntries(maker.sph, maker.size) {
				t.Fatalf("invalid sparse map: %v", maker.sph)
			}
			spd := invertSparseEntries(maker.sph, maker.size)
			fw = &regFileWriter{w, maker.makeReg.size}
			fw = &sparseFileWriter{fw, spd, 0}

MockWebServer
=============

A scriptable web server for testing HTTP clients


### Motivation

This library makes it easy to test that your app Does The Right Thing when it
makes HTTP and HTTPS calls. It lets you specify which responses to return and
then verify that requests were made as expected.

Because it exercises your full HTTP stack, you can be confident that you're

		// not be required but makes reproduction much easier.
		nsLk.lockMapMutex.Lock()

		// lk3 blocks.
		lk3ch := make(chan bool)
		go func() {
			lk3ch <- nsLk.lock(ctx, "volume", "path", "source", "opsID", false, 0)
		}()

		// lk4, blocks.
		lk4ch := make(chan bool)
		go func() {
			lk4ch <- nsLk.lock(ctx, "volume", "path", "source", "opsID", false, 0)

		var fr fileReader
		switch maker := v.maker.(type) {
		case makeReg:
			r := testNonEmptyReader{strings.NewReader(maker.str)}
			fr = &regFileReader{r, maker.size}
		case makeSparse:
			if !validateSparseEntries(maker.spd, maker.size) {
				t.Fatalf("invalid sparse map: %v", maker.spd)
			}
			sph := invertSparseEntries(maker.spd, maker.size)
			r := testNonEmptyReader{strings.NewReader(maker.makeReg.str)}

If there's a security flaw in your code, it will still exist.

    //    queue, immediately followed by another thread taking the next element in the queue. That
    //    second thread can then dispatch to the subscriber it took before the first thread does.
    //
    // All this makes me really wonder if there's any value in queueing here at all. A dispatcher
    // that simply loops through the subscribers and dispatches the event to each would actually

## Install `websockets` { #install-websockets }

Make sure you create a [virtual environment](../virtual-environments.md){.internal-link target=_blank}, activate it, and install `websockets` (a Python library that makes it easy to use the "WebSocket" protocol):

<div class="termy">

```console
$ pip install websockets

---> 100%
```

</div>

          MyAnalyticsTag(...)
        }

        return chain.proceed(chain.request())
      }
    ```

 *  New: Support request bodies on HTTP/1.1 connection upgrades.
 *  New: `EventListener.plus()` makes it easier to observe events in multiple listeners.
 *  Fix: Don't spam logs with _‘Method isLoggable in android.util.Log not mocked.’_ when using
    OkHttp in Robolectric and Paparazzi tests.

 * remain in their original namespace. This reduces the final Gradle distribution
 * size and makes us more conscious of which parts of a library we really need.
 *
 * WARNING: if you decide to do the minification by hand, make sure that you cover all paths of loading classes:
 * reflection, dynamic loading, etc. and understand how the library works internally.