if !isNetworkError(err) {
						bootLogOnceIf(context.Background(), fmt.Errorf("%s has incorrect configuration: %w", clnt, err), "incorrect_"+clnt.String())
						incorrectConfigs = append(incorrectConfigs, fmt.Errorf("%s has incorrect configuration: %w", clnt, err))
					} else {
						offlineEndpoints = append(offlineEndpoints, fmt.Errorf("%s is unreachable: %w", clnt, err))
					}

slices, and strings in most Go implementations,
such races can in turn lead to arbitrary memory corruption.
</p>

<p>
Examples of incorrect synchronization are given in the
“Incorrect synchronization” section below.
</p>

<p>
Examples of the limitations on implementations are given in the
“Incorrect compilation” section below.
</p>

<h2 id="synchronization">Synchronization</h2>

<h3 id="init">Initialization</h3>

* Convertir les types correspondants (si nécessaire).
* Valider la donnée.
    * Si la donnée est invalide, une erreur propre et claire sera renvoyée, indiquant exactement où était la donnée incorrecte.
* Passer la donnée reçue dans le paramètre `item`.

	// code generated by the AEAD cipher.
	//
	// Here is an incorrect implementation of IsEncrypted:
	//
	//   return len(e) > 16 && !bytes.ContainsRune(e, '-')
	//
	// An encrypted ETag may contain some random bytes - e.g.
	// and nonce value. This nonce value may contain a '-'
	// just by its nature of being randomly generated.
	// The above implementation would incorrectly consider
	// such an ETag (with a nonce value containing a '-')

incorrect call sequence for `f(0)`. New in this release is a better detector for
this error condition when the incompatible declarations appear in different
files. See [#67699](/issue/67699).

### Vet

The new `tests` analyzer reports common mistakes in declarations of
tests, fuzzers, benchmarks, and examples in test packages, such as
malformed names, incorrect signatures, or examples that document

  public void testEntrySet_hashCode_size0() {
    assertEquals(
        "multiset.entrySet() has incorrect hash code", 0, getMultiset().entrySet().hashCode());
  }

  @CollectionSize.Require(ONE)
  public void testEntrySet_hashCode_size1() {
    assertEquals(
        "multiset.entrySet() has incorrect hash code",
        1 ^ e0().hashCode(),
        getMultiset().entrySet().hashCode());
  }

  public void testEntrySet_hashCode_size0() {
    assertEquals(
        "multiset.entrySet() has incorrect hash code", 0, getMultiset().entrySet().hashCode());
  }

  @CollectionSize.Require(ONE)
  public void testEntrySet_hashCode_size1() {
    assertEquals(
        "multiset.entrySet() has incorrect hash code",
        1 ^ e0().hashCode(),
        getMultiset().entrySet().hashCode());
  }

    if not user_dict:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail="Incorrect username or password")
    user = UserInDB(**user_dict)
    hashed_password = fake_hash_password(form_data.password)
    if not hashed_password == user.hashed_password:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail="Incorrect username or password")

    return {"access_token": user.username, "token_type": "bearer"}

    if not user_dict:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail="Incorrect username or password")
    user = UserInDB(**user_dict)
    hashed_password = fake_hash_password(form_data.password)
    if not hashed_password == user.hashed_password:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail="Incorrect username or password")

    return {"access_token": user.username, "token_type": "bearer"}

#### Die Zeit zum Antworten hilft den Angreifern

Wenn die Angreifer zu diesem Zeitpunkt feststellen, dass der Server einige Mikrosekunden länger braucht, um die Antwort „Incorrect username or password“ zu senden, wissen sie, dass sie _etwas_ richtig gemacht haben, einige der Anfangsbuchstaben waren richtig.