{
					Key:    "foo_3",
					Value:  "bar_3",
					Effect: v1.TaintEffectNoExecute,
				},
				{
					Key:    "foo_2",
					Value:  "bar_2",
					Effect: v1.TaintEffectNoSchedule,
				},
			},
			expectedTaintsToAdd: []*v1.Taint{
				{
					Key:    "foo_1",
					Value:  "bar_1",
					Effect: v1.TaintEffectNoExecute,
				},
				{
					Key:    "foo_2",
					Value:  "different-value",

# This test is tailored to reproduce b/141617294. In particular, the function
# library contains "foo1", "foo2", ..., "foo20", from which "foo1" and "foo11"
# were mapped to the same name "foo110" in the bug.
node {
  name: "unnamed"
  op: "foo1"
}
node {
  name: "unnamed1"
  op: "foo11"
}
library {
  function {
    signature {
      name: "foo1"
    }
  }
  function {
    signature {
      name: "foo2"
    }
  }

	xx = yy
	return xx
}

func foo10(xx, yy *int) { // ERROR "xx does not escape$" "yy does not escape$"
	*xx = *yy
}

func foo11() int {
	x, y := 0, 42
	xx := &x
	yy := &y
	*xx = *yy
	return x
}

var xxx **int

func foo12(yyy **int) { // ERROR "leaking param: yyy$"
	xxx = yyy
}

	xx = yy
	return xx
}

func foo10(xx, yy *int) { // ERROR "xx does not escape$" "yy does not escape$"
	*xx = *yy
}

func foo11() int {
	x, y := 0, 42
	xx := &x
	yy := &y
	*xx = *yy
	return x
}

var xxx **int

func foo12(yyy **int) { // ERROR "leaking param: yyy$"
	xxx = yyy
}

		// remove a driver
		ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{Name: "foo1"},
		Spec: storage.CSINodeSpec{
			Drivers: []storage.CSINodeDriver{{
				Name:         "io.kubernetes.storage.csi.driver-1",
				NodeID:       nodeID,
				TopologyKeys: []string{"company.com/zone1", "company.com/zone2"},
			}},
		},
	}, {
		// add a driver
		ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{Name: "foo1"},
		Spec: storage.CSINodeSpec{

            }
            configurations {
                conf
            }
        """
        def foo11 = mavenRepo.module("org", "foo", '1.0').publish()
        mavenRepo.module("org", "foo", '1.1').publish()
        mavenRepo.module("org", "bar", '1.0').dependsOn(foo11).publish()
    }

    void "force resolution strategy is applied to dependency constraints"() {
        given:
        buildFile << """

fun Greeting(): String {
    return "Hi $foo!"
}

// FILE: p3/foo.kt
package p3

import org.jetbrains.kotlin.fir.plugin.MyComposable

private var foo_ = 0

fun setFoo(newFoo: Int) {
    foo_ = newFoo
}

val foo: Int

	_ = x.foo1 // ERROR "x.foo1 undefined (type S has no field or method foo1, but does have field Foo1)"
	_ = x.foo2 // ERROR "x.foo2 undefined (type S has no field or method foo2, but does have field FoO2)"
	_ = x.foo3 // OK
	_ = x.foo4 // ERROR "x.foo4 undefined (type S has no field or method foo4, but does have field foO4)"
}

func _() {
	_ = S{Foo1: 0} // OK

				constructResource("foo1", "foo1.bar.com", "192.1.1.1", "1"),
				constructResource("foo2", "foo2.bar.com", "192.1.1.2", "1"),
			},
			expectedResources: [][]string{
				{"foo1", "foo1.bar.com", "192.1.1.1"},
				{"foo2", "foo2.bar.com", "192.1.1.2"},
			},
		},
		{
			desc: "create-resources-rev-1",
			resources: []*anypb.Any{
				constructResource("foo1", "foo1.bar.com", "192.1.1.1", "1"),

            #include "foo.h"
            int main () {
               foo1();
               foo2();
               return 0;
            }
        """),

        sourceFile("c/foo1", "foo.c", """
            #include <stdio.h>
            #include "foo.h"

            void foo1() {
                printf("foo1");
            }
        """),

        sourceFile("c/foo2", "foo.c", """