errorMessage.set("SetException call exited before future was complete.");
              }
            }
          });
      executor.execute(
          new Runnable() {
            @Override
            public void run() {
              future.cancel(true);
              if (!future.isDone()) {
                errorMessage.set("Cancel call exited before future was complete.");
              }

                errorMessage.set("SetException call exited before future was complete.");
              }
            }
          });
      executor.execute(
          new Runnable() {
            @Override
            public void run() {
              future.cancel(true);
              if (!future.isDone()) {
                errorMessage.set("Cancel call exited before future was complete.");
              }

        assertTrue(permissionDenied.getMessage().contains("Permission denied"));

        // Scenario 4: Exit code error
        CommandExecutionException exitCodeError = new CommandExecutionException("Command exited with non-zero code: 127");
        assertTrue(exitCodeError.getMessage().contains("non-zero code"));
    }

       *
       * - in the "reentrant submit" case of `execute` (in which case we must have started running a
       *   user task -- which means that we already got past this code (or else we exited early
       *   above))
       */
      // Unconditionally set; there is no risk of throwing away a queued task from another thread,

 * files to be deleted. The limit does not include filesystem overhead or the cache journal so
 * space-sensitive applications should set a conservative limit.
 *
 * Clients call [edit] to create or update the values of an entry. An entry may have only one editor
 * at one time; if a value is not available to be edited then [edit] will return null.
 *

 * requested entries may be evicted on each cache modification.
 *
 * <p>If {@link #expireAfterWrite expireAfterWrite} or {@link #expireAfterAccess expireAfterAccess}
 * is requested entries may be evicted on each cache modification, on occasional cache accesses, or
 * on calls to {@link Cache#cleanUp}. Expired entries may be counted by {@link Cache#size}, but will

- Add `container_state` label to `running_container_count` kubelet metrics, to get count of containers based on their state(running/exited/created/unknown) ([#81573](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/81573), [@irajdeep](https://github.com/irajdeep))

   * CacheBuilder#expireAfterWrite} or {@link CacheBuilder#expireAfterAccess}.
   */
  EXPIRED {
    @Override
    boolean wasEvicted() {
      return true;
    }
  },

  /**
   * The entry was evicted due to size constraints. This can occur when using {@link
   * CacheBuilder#maximumSize} or {@link CacheBuilder#maximumWeight}.
   */
  SIZE {
    @Override

errors.app.db.already.updated = Es posible que ya haya sido actualizado por otro proceso. Por favor, inténtelo de nuevo.
errors.app.db.already.exists = Los datos ya existen. Por favor, inténtelo de nuevo.
errors.app.double.submit.request = Es posible que esta solicitud ya se haya procesado. Por favor, inténtelo de nuevo.

   * process with an exit status of 1, indicating abnormal termination.
   */
  public static UncaughtExceptionHandler systemExit() {
    return new Exiter(Runtime.getRuntime()::exit);
  }

  @VisibleForTesting
  interface RuntimeWrapper {
    void exit(int status);
  }

  @VisibleForTesting
  static final class Exiter implements UncaughtExceptionHandler {