* the License.
 */

package com.google.common.util.concurrent;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Computes a value, possibly asynchronously. For an example usage and more information, see {@link
 * Futures.FutureCombiner#callAsync(AsyncCallable, java.util.concurrent.Executor)}.
 *

import com.google.common.util.concurrent.ListenableFuture;
import com.google.common.util.concurrent.ListenableFutureTask;
import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.concurrent.Executor;

/**
 * Computes or retrieves values, based on a key, for use in populating a {@link LoadingCache}.
 *
 * <p>Most implementations will only need to implement {@link #load}. Other methods may be
 * overridden as desired.
 *

# Copyright 2025 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
# Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
# license that can be found in the LICENSE file.

# Mercurial extension to add a 'goreposum' command that
# computes a hash of a remote repo's tag state.
# Tag definitions can come from the .hgtags file stored in
# any head of any branch, and the server protocol does not
# expose the tags directly. However, the protocol does expose

	"github.com/minio/minio/internal/ioutil"
)

// A Reader wraps an io.Reader and computes the MD5 checksum
// of the read content as ETag. Optionally, it also computes
// the SHA256 checksum of the content.
//
// If the reference values for the ETag and content SHA26
// are not empty then it will check whether the computed
// match the reference values.
type Reader struct {
	src         io.Reader
	bytesRead   int64

	}
	return wrapReader{
		Reader: wrapped,
	}
}

// A Reader wraps an io.Reader and computes the
// MD5 checksum of the read content as ETag.
//
// Optionally, a Reader can also verify that
// the computed ETag matches an expected value.
// Therefore, it compares both ETags once the
// underlying io.Reader returns io.EOF.
// If the computed ETag does not match the
// expected ETag then Read returns a VerifyError.
//

// when the object is uploaded in multiple parts via the S3
// multipart API. Instead, S3 first computes a MD5 of each part:
//
//	 e1 := MD5(part-1)
//	 e2 := MD5(part-2)
//	...
//	 eN := MD5(part-N)
//
// Then, the ETag of the object is computed as MD5 of all individual
// part checksums. S3 also encodes the number of parts into the ETag
// by appending a -<number-of-parts> at the end:
//

import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import java.util.concurrent.Executor;
import java.util.concurrent.RejectedExecutionException;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/** Aggregate future that computes its value by calling a callable. */
@GwtCompatible
final class CombinedFuture<V extends @Nullable Object>
    extends AggregateFuture<@Nullable Object, V> {
  @LazyInit private @Nullable CombinedFutureInterruptibleTask<?> task;

	case h.End == -1:
		rangeLength = resourceSize - h.Start

	default:
		return 0, errors.New("Unexpected range specification case")
	}

	return rangeLength, nil
}

// GetOffsetLength computes the start offset and length of the range
// given the size of the resource
func (h *HTTPRangeSpec) GetOffsetLength(resourceSize int64) (start, length int64, err error) {
	if h == nil {

          <comment>Generated hashCode() and equals() based on identifier also calls its super, which breaks comparison
          </comment>
          <code>
            <![CDATA[
    /**
     * Computes a hash value based on {@link #getType()} and {@link #getProvides()} values.
     */
    public int hashCode() {
        return java.util.Objects.hash(getType(), getProvides());
    } //-- int hashCode()

    /**

  private static long hashLength16(long u, long v, long mul) {
    long a = (u ^ v) * mul;
    a ^= a >>> 47;
    long b = (v ^ a) * mul;
    b ^= b >>> 47;
    b *= mul;
    return b;
  }

  /**
   * Computes intermediate hash of 32 bytes of byte array from the given offset. Results are
   * returned in the output array because when we last measured, this was 12% faster than allocating
   * new arrays every time.
   */