?: throw ProtocolException("expected a value at $reader")

        val choice =
          choices.firstOrNull { it.matches(peekedHeader) }
            ?: throw ProtocolException(
              "expected a matching choice but was $peekedHeader at $reader",
            )

        return choice to choice.fromDer(reader)
      }

      override fun toDer(
        writer: DerWriter,

    attributeTypeAndValue.asSetOf().asSequenceOf()

  /**
   * ```
   * Name ::= CHOICE {
   *   -- only one possibility for now --
   *   rdnSequence  RDNSequence
   * }
   * ```
   */
  internal val name: DerAdapter<Pair<DerAdapter<*>, Any?>> =
    Adapters.choice(
      rdnSequence,
    )

  /**
   * ```
   * SubjectPublicKeyInfo ::= SEQUENCE  {

 * Google patches: various bugfixes, lastAccess support, retrying requests
 * A proper test suite
 * Various fixes

## Others

### This jcifs or jcifs-ng

jcifs-ng will be a proper choice for many users. 
There are a lot of SMB devices in the world.
Some of them only work with the old jcifs library.
If you want to support many SMB devices, CodeLibs jcifs library will be helpful.

        serverPools := z.getServerPoolsAvailableSpace(ctx)
        total := serverPools.TotalAvailable()
        // choose when we reach this many
        choose := rand.Uint64() % total
        atTotal := uint64(0)
        for _, pool := range serverPools {
                atTotal += pool.Available
                if atTotal > choose && pool.Available > 0 {
                        return pool.Index
                }
        }

#
# Here is how to choose your TFCI value:
# 1. A Python version must come first, because other scripts reference it.
#      Ex. py39  -- Python 3.9
#      Ex. py310 -- Python 3.10
#      Ex. py311 -- Python 3.11
#      Ex. py312 -- Python 3.12
# 2. Choose the platform, which corresponds to the version of TensorFlow to
#    build. This should also match the system you're using--you cannot build

     * For example, an artifact of type {@value org.apache.maven.api.Type#JAR} can be placed
     * either on the class-path or on the module-path. The project needs to make a choice
     * (possibly using heuristic rules), then to add the dependency in only one of the options
     * identified by {@link PathType}.
     *
     * @return file paths to place on the different tool options
     */

   * making this call. If it is not sorted, the results are undefined.
   *
   * <p>If there are elements in the list which compare as equal to the key, the choice of {@link
   * KeyPresentBehavior} decides which index is returned. If no elements compare as equal to the
   * key, the choice of {@link KeyAbsentBehavior} decides which index is returned.
   *
   * <p>This method runs in log(n) time on random-access lists, which offer near-constant-time

   * making this call. If it is not sorted, the results are undefined.
   *
   * <p>If there are elements in the list which compare as equal to the key, the choice of {@link
   * KeyPresentBehavior} decides which index is returned. If no elements compare as equal to the
   * key, the choice of {@link KeyAbsentBehavior} decides which index is returned.
   *
   * <p>This method runs in log(n) time on random-access lists, which offer near-constant-time

 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>Why use a custom annotation instead of {@code android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Suppress}?
 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a

import java.net.ProtocolException

/**
 * Handles basic types that always use the same tag. This supports optional types and may set a type
 * hint for further adapters to process.
 *
 * Types like ANY and CHOICE that don't have a consistent tag cannot use this.
 */
internal data class BasicDerAdapter<T>(
  private val name: String,
  /** The tag class this adapter expects, or -1 to match any tag class. */
  val tagClass: Int,