}

	for i := 0; i < config.Toys; i++ {
		user.Toys = append(user.Toys, Toy{Name: name + "_toy_" + strconv.Itoa(i+1)})
	}

	for i := 0; i < config.Tools; i++ {
		user.Tools = append(user.Tools, Tools{Name: name + "_tool_" + strconv.Itoa(i+1)})
	}

	if config.Company {
		user.Company = Company{Name: "company-" + name}
	}

	if config.Manager {

import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Experimental;
import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Immutable;

/**
 * Represents most common tools supported by CLIng.
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Immutable
@Experimental
public final class Tools {
    private Tools() {}

    public static final String MVN_CMD = "mvn";
    public static final String MVN_NAME = "Maven";

Guillaume Nodet <******@****.***> 1729859506 +0200

 * specific language governing permissions and limitations
 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven.api;

import javax.tools.DocumentationTool;
import javax.tools.JavaFileManager;
import javax.tools.StandardLocation;

import java.io.File;
import java.nio.file.Path;
import java.util.Objects;
import java.util.Optional;
import java.util.StringJoiner;

     *
     * @return the toolchain model
     */
    ToolchainModel getModel();

    /**
     * Gets the platform tool executable.
     *
     * @param toolName the tool platform independent tool name
     * @return file representing the tool executable, or null if the tool cannot be found
     */
    String findTool(String toolName);

    /**
     * Let the toolchain decide if it matches requirements defined

    @Nonnull
    static Builder mvn(@Nonnull List<String> args, @Nonnull MessageBuilderFactory messageBuilderFactory) {
        return builder(Tools.MVN_CMD, Tools.MVN_NAME, args, messageBuilderFactory);
    }

    /**
     * Creates a new Builder instance for constructing a Maven Encrypting Tool ParserRequest.
     *
     * @param args the command-line arguments
     * @param messageBuilderFactory the factory for creating message builders

Wenn Sie sich die Benchmarks ansehen, werden häufig mehrere Tools mit unterschiedlichen Eigenschaften als gleichwertig verglichen.

Konkret geht es darum, Uvicorn, Starlette und FastAPI miteinander zu vergleichen (neben vielen anderen Tools).

Je einfacher das Problem, welches durch das Tool gelöst wird, desto besser ist die Performanz. Und die meisten Benchmarks testen nicht die zusätzlichen Funktionen, welche das Tool bietet.

Die Hierarchie ist wie folgt:

 *   <li>Master password management</li>
 *   <li>Security settings configuration</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * @see org.apache.maven.api.cli.Tools#MVNENC_CMD
 * @see org.apache.maven.api.cli.Tools#MVNENC_NAME
 * @since 4.0.0
 */

 *   <li>Dependency version management</li>
 *   <li>Configuration migration</li>
 *   <li>Interactive upgrade workflows</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * @see org.apache.maven.api.cli.Tools#MVNUP_CMD
 * @see org.apache.maven.api.cli.Tools#MVNUP_NAME
 * @since 4.0.0
 */

 *   <li>Project-specific configuration</li>
 *   <li>Goal execution and phase mapping</li>
 *   <li>Multi-module build coordination</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * @see org.apache.maven.api.cli.Tools#MVN_CMD
 * @see org.apache.maven.api.cli.Tools#MVN_NAME
 * @since 4.0.0
 */