Signature Algorithm: ED25519
        Issuer: CN = consoleAdmin
        Validity
            Not Before: Jul 19 15:08:44 2021 GMT
            Not After : Aug 18 15:08:44 2021 GMT
        Subject: CN = consoleAdmin
        Subject Public Key Info:
            Public Key Algorithm: ED25519
                ED25519 Public-Key:
                pub:

ssh-ed25519 AAAAC3NzaC1lZDI1NTE5AAAAIDVGk/SRz4fwTPK0+Ra7WYUGf3o08YkpI0yTMPpHwYoq ******@****.***...

since those use the underlying algorithm. This list is sent to the client if
it supports the server-sig-algs extension. Order is irrelevant.

Valid values
```
ssh-ed25519
sk-ssh-ed25519@openssh.com
******@****.***
ecdsa-sha2-nistp256
ecdsa-sha2-nistp384
ecdsa-sha2-nistp521
rsa-sha2-256
rsa-sha2-512
ssh-rsa
ssh-dss
```

            len += pad8(bufferIndex);
        } else if (compound && this.nextCommand == 0 && this.readSize > 0) {
            // Apply compound response handling as per MS-SMB2 3.2.5.1.9 - correct for both compound and single responses
            // 3.2.5.1.9 Handling Compounded Responses
            // The final response in the compounded response chain will have NextCommand equal to 0,

- Kube-apiserver: ControllerRevision objects are now verified to contain valid JSON data in the `data` field. ([#125549](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/125549), [@liggitt](https://github.com/liggitt)) [SIG API Machinery and Apps]

    @ParameterizedTest
    @CsvSource({ "1, 1", // DISK
            "2, 2", // PIPE
            "3, 3", // PRINT
            "0, 0", // Unknown
            "255, -1" // Byte overflow to signed
    })
    void testDifferentShareTypes(int shareTypeValue, int expectedValue) throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
        // Given
        byte[] buffer = new byte[256];

   * IPv4 compatible address (and equivalent to {@code "::192.168.0.1"}).
   *
   * <p>For more on IPv4 compatible addresses see section 2.5.5.1 of <a target="_parent"
   * href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#section-2.5.5.1">RFC 4291</a>.
   *
   * <p>NOTE: This method is different from {@link Inet6Address#isIPv4CompatibleAddress} in that it

   * IPv4 compatible address (and equivalent to {@code "::192.168.0.1"}).
   *
   * <p>For more on IPv4 compatible addresses see section 2.5.5.1 of <a target="_parent"
   * href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#section-2.5.5.1">RFC 4291</a>.
   *
   * <p>NOTE: This method is different from {@link Inet6Address#isIPv4CompatibleAddress} in that it

*Element) One() *Element { *v = *feOne return v } // reduce reduces v modulo 2^255 - 19 and returns it. func (v *Element) reduce() *Element { v.carryPropagate() // After the light reduction we now have a field element representation // v < 2^255 + 2^13 * 19, but need v < 2^255 - 19. // If v >= 2^255 - 19, then v + 19 >= 2^255, which would overflow 2^255 - 1, // generating a carry. That is, c will be 0 if v < 2^255 - 19, and 1 otherwise. c := (v.l0 + 19) >> 51 c = (v.l1 + c) >> 51 c = (v.l2 + c) >>...

		0: {"--", -2147483647, "negative"},
		1: {"", maxInt, ""},
		2: {"-", 10, ""},
		3: {"gopher", 0, ""},
		4: {"-", -1, "negative"},
		5: {"--", -102, "negative"},
		6: {string(make([]byte, 255)), int((^uint(0))/255 + 1), "overflow"},
	})

	const is64Bit = 1<<(^uintptr(0)>>63)/2 != 0
	if !is64Bit {
		return
	}

	runTestCases("64-bit", []testCase{
		0: {"-", maxInt, "out of range"},
	})
}