panic("Failed to acquire read lock")
	}
	// fmt.Println("1st read lock acquired, waiting...")

	if !lrwm.GetRLock(ctx, "", "object1", time.Second) {
		panic("Failed to acquire read lock")
	}
	// fmt.Println("2nd read lock acquired, waiting...")

	go func() {
		time.Sleep(2 * time.Second)
		lrwm.RUnlock()
		// fmt.Println("1st read lock released, waiting...")
	}()

	go func() {
		time.Sleep(3 * time.Second)
		lrwm.RUnlock()

		// fmt.Println("1st read lock released, waiting...")
	}()

	go func() {
		time.Sleep(3 * testDrwMutexAcquireTimeout)
		drwm2.RUnlock(context.Background())
		// fmt.Println("2nd read lock released, waiting...")
	}()

	drwm3 := NewDRWMutex(ds, "simplelock")
	// fmt.Println("Trying to acquire write lock, waiting...")
	ctx3, cancel3 := context.WithCancel(context.Background())

[19511] [INFO] Started server process [19511]
[19511] [INFO] Waiting for application startup.
[19511] [INFO] Application startup complete.
[19513] [INFO] Started server process [19513]
[19513] [INFO] Waiting for application startup.
[19513] [INFO] Application startup complete.
[19514] [INFO] Started server process [19514]
[19514] [INFO] Waiting for application startup.
[19514] [INFO] Application startup complete.

In this scenario of "fast food burgers with your crush", as there is a lot of waiting 🕙, it makes a lot more sense to have a concurrent system ⏸🔀⏯.

This is the case for most of the web applications.

Many, many users, but your server is waiting 🕙 for their not-so-good connection to send their requests.

And then waiting 🕙 again for the responses to come back.

<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Waiting for application startup.
<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Application startup complete.
<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Started server process [<font color="#06989A">27369</font>]
<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Waiting for application startup.
<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Application startup complete.

<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Waiting for application startup.
<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Application startup complete.
<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Started server process [<font color="#06989A">27369</font>]
<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Waiting for application startup.
<font color="#4E9A06">INFO</font>:     Application startup complete.

 * ordinary tests.
 *
 * <p>Failure of the expected event to occur within an implementation-defined "reasonable" time
 * period or an interrupt while waiting for the expected event will result in a {@link
 * RuntimeException}.
 *
 * <p>Here's an example that tests a {@code finalize} method:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * final CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(1);

		return format, nil
	}

	// Return error when quorum unformatted disks - indicating we are
	// waiting for first server to be online.
	unformattedDisks := quorumUnformattedDisks(sErrs)
	if unformattedDisks && !firstDisk {
		return nil, errNotFirstDisk
	}

	// Return error when quorum unformatted disks but waiting for rest
	// of the servers to be online.
	if unformattedDisks && firstDisk {
		return nil, errFirstDiskWait

      assertThat(activeThreads).isEqualTo(0)
    }
  }

  /** Unblock a waiting task thread. Used by the test thread only. */
  fun interruptCoordinatorThread() {
    taskRunner.assertThreadDoesntHoldLock()
    require(currentTask == TestThreadSerialTask)

    // Queue a task to interrupt the waiting coordinator.
    serialTaskQueue +=
      object : SerialTask {
        override fun start() {

 * ordinary tests.
 *
 * <p>Failure of the expected event to occur within an implementation-defined "reasonable" time
 * period or an interrupt while waiting for the expected event will result in a {@link
 * RuntimeException}.
 *
 * <p>Here's an example that tests a {@code finalize} method:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * final CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(1);