It's better to discuss privately and try to find a solution first, to limit the potential impact as much as possible.

---

Thanks for your help!

Try to find the good side. In general, if people are not being unfriendly, try to thank their effort and interest, even if you disagree with the main subject (discussion, PR), just thank them for being interested in the project, or for having dedicated some time to try to do something.

It's difficult to convey emotion in text, use emojis to help. 😅

    private final SrvCopychunk[] chunks;

    /**
     * Constructs a server copy chunk operation request
     * @param sourceKey the resume key identifying the source file
     * @param chunks the array of copy chunk descriptors
     */
    public SrvCopychunkCopy(final byte[] sourceKey, final SrvCopychunk... chunks) {
        this.sourceKey = sourceKey;
        this.chunks = chunks;
    }

    /**
     * {@inheritDoc}

        void testDecodeVariousChunksWritten(int chunks) throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
            byte[] buffer = createValidCopyChunkResponse(chunks, 0, 0);

            int bytesDecoded = response.decode(buffer, 0, buffer.length);

            assertEquals(12, bytesDecoded);
            assertEquals(chunks, response.getChunksWritten());
        }

        @ParameterizedTest

name: Privileged
description: You are @tiangolo or he asked you directly to create an issue here. If not, check the other options. 👇
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: |
        Thanks for your interest in FastAPI! 🚀

        If you are not @tiangolo or he didn't ask you directly to create an issue here, please start the conversation in a [Question in GitHub Discussions](https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/discussions/categories/questions) instead.

name: Feature request
description: File a proposal for new feature, improvement
labels: ["enhancement"]

body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: |
        Thanks for taking the time to fill out this new feature, improvement proposal.

  - type: textarea
    id: message
    attributes:
      label: New feature, improvement proposal
    validations:

        @DisplayName("Should return correct size with multiple chunks")
        @ValueSource(ints = { 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 100 })
        void testSizeWithMultipleChunks(int chunkCount) {
            // Given
            byte[] sourceKey = new byte[SOURCE_KEY_SIZE];
            SrvCopychunk[] chunks = new SrvCopychunk[chunkCount];
            for (int i = 0; i < chunkCount; i++) {
                chunks[i] = new SrvCopychunk(i * 100, i * 200, i * 300);

labels: [lang-all]
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: |
        Thanks for your interest in helping translate the FastAPI docs! 🌍

        Please follow these instructions carefully to propose a new language translation. 🙏

        This structured process helps ensure translations can be properly maintained long-term.
  - type: checkboxes
    id: checks
    attributes:
      label: Initial Checks

name: Bug Report
description: File a bug report
labels: ["bug"]

body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: |
        Thanks for taking the time to fill out this bug report.     

        Simple fixes in single PRs do not require issues. 
  
        **Do you use the latest project version?**

  - type: input
    id: version

                            wsize = byteLimit;
                        }

                        int chunks = (int) (wsize / maxChunkSize);
                        int lastChunkSize;
                        if (chunks + 1 > maxChunks) {
                            chunks = maxChunks;
                            lastChunkSize = maxChunkSize;
                        } else {