- Adheres to MinIO’s coding standards (e.g., Go style, error handling, testing).

PRs must flow smoothly through review to reach production. Large PRs should be split into smaller, manageable ones.

## Submitting PRs

1. **Title and Summary**:
   - Use a scannable title: `[Subsystem] Action Description #Issue` (e.g., `[IAM] Add role-based access control #567`).

Some of the tasks they can perform include:

* Adding labels to PRs.
* Editing PR titles.
* Adding commits on top of PRs to tweak them.
* Mark answers in GitHub Discussions questions, etc.
* Merge some specific types of PRs.

You can see the current team members in [FastAPI People - Team](./fastapi-people.md#team).

### Closing Automated and AI PRs

If we see PRs that seem AI generated or automated in similar ways, we'll flag them and close them.

The same applies to comments and descriptions, please don't copy paste the content generated by an LLM.

### Human Effort Denial of Service

          #Comma separated list of labels that can be assigned to issues to exclude them from being marked as stale
          exempt-issue-labels: 'override-stale'
          #Comma separated list of labels that can be assigned to PRs to exclude them from being marked as stale
          exempt-pr-labels: "override-stale"
          #Limit the No. of API calls in one run default value is 30.
          operations-per-run: 1000
          days-before-issue-stale: 7

        }
        val prs: MutableList<GitHubPullRequest> = mutableListOf()
        for (page in 1..10) {
            val prPage = getMergedContributorPullRequests(page)
            prs.addAll(prPage)
            if (prPage.size < PAGE_SIZE) {
                break
            }
        }
        return prs
            .filter { it.milestone?.title?.startsWith(milestone.get()) == true }

3. **A relationship, not a transaction.** We view community PRs as an important part of our relationship with the Gradle community. We hope contributors will learn from the review process, stay engaged, and continue helping us build Gradle.

## In summary

We welcome AI-assisted contributions from people who understand what they're submitting and are ready to collaborate on it.

* **Embrace modern AI coding practices**: Leave everything up to an LLM to decide. The model knows best. Always.
* **No code reviews**: There's no code to review. No PRs to approve. No comments to address. Embrace vibe coding fully, replace the theater of approving and merging vibe coded PRs that no one looks at with full proper vibes only.

/// tip

        if (contributorsInPullRequestsButNotInReleaseNotes.isNotEmpty()) {
            error(
                """The contributors in the release notes $releaseNotes don't match the contributors in the PRs.
                Release notes:  $contributorsInReleaseNotes
                Pull requests:  $contributorsFromPullRequests
                Missed in notes:$contributorsInPullRequestsButNotInReleaseNotes

/// info

Unfortunately, I can't simply trust PRs that just have several approvals.

Several times it has happened that there are PRs with 3, 5 or more approvals, probably because the description is appealing, but when I check the PRs, they are actually broken, have a bug, or don't solve the problem they claim to solve. 😅

              "answered": {
                "delay": 864000,
                "message": "Assuming the original need was handled, this will be automatically closed now. But feel free to add more comments or create new issues or PRs."
              },
              "waiting": {
                "delay": 2628000,