* Note that this operation is only concerned about determining the coordinates of the transitive dependencies and
     * does not actually resolve the artifact files.
     *
     * @param session the {@link Session}, must not be {@code null}
     * @param root the Maven Dependency, must not be {@code null}

      value: >
        #### Ubiquity: provide concrete use cases


        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this feature in a real-world scenario, or is it
        just a feature that seems like a sensible addition to Guava?


        Before new features get added to Guava, we really want to be sure that it's for a use case
        that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the real-world use case so the

### `scope` { #scope }

The spec also says that the client can send another form field "`scope`".

The form field name is `scope` (in singular), but it is actually a long string with "scopes" separated by spaces.

Each "scope" is just a string (without spaces).

They are normally used to declare specific security permissions, for example:

  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this enhancement in a real-world scenario, or does
        it just seem like a sensible behavior for the feature to have?


        Before we make significant changes to existing features in Guava, we really want to be sure
        that it's for a use case that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the

```

////

The last `CommonQueryParams`, in:

```Python
... Depends(CommonQueryParams)
```

...is what **FastAPI** will actually use to know what is the dependency.

It is from this one that FastAPI will extract the declared parameters and that is what FastAPI will actually call.

---

In this case, the first `CommonQueryParams`, in:

//// tab | Python 3.8+

```Python

 * @see Artifact
 */
@Experimental
public interface LocalRepositoryManager extends Service {

    /**
     * Gets the relative path for a locally installed artifact.
     * Note that the artifact need not actually exist yet at
     * the returned location, the path merely indicates where
     * the artifact would eventually be stored.
     *
     * @param session The session to use, must not be {@code null}.

        assertTrue(rule.isTarget(1, 30, 1)); // 1:30 on Sunday (actually Monday morning)
        assertTrue(rule.isTarget(2, 0, 1)); // 2:00 on Sunday (actually Monday morning)

        // Outside range
        assertFalse(rule.isTarget(21, 59, 1)); // 21:59 on Sunday
        assertFalse(rule.isTarget(2, 1, 1)); // 2:01 on Sunday (actually Monday morning)
    }

    public void test_intervalRule_isTarget_specificDays() {

## Return Type and Data Filtering { #return-type-and-data-filtering }

Let's continue from the previous example. We wanted to **annotate the function with one type**, but we wanted to be able to return from the function something that actually includes **more data**.

We want FastAPI to keep **filtering** the data using the response model. So that even though the function returns more data, the response will only include the fields declared in the response model.

The webhooks that you define will end up in the **OpenAPI** schema and the automatic **docs UI**.

/// info

The `app.webhooks` object is actually just an `APIRouter`, the same type you would use when structuring your app with multiple files.

///

        }
        msg += ")";
        logger.debug(msg);
    }

    @Override
    public void manageArtifactVersion(Artifact artifact, Artifact replacement) {
        // only show msg if a change is actually taking place
        if (!replacement.getVersion().equals(artifact.getVersion())) {
            String msg = indent + artifact + " (applying version: " + replacement.getVersion() + ")";
            logger.debug(msg);