void releaseStoresAndZeroesBuffer() {
        BufferCacheImpl impl = new BufferCacheImpl(2, 10);

        byte[] b = new byte[10];
        // Fill with non-zero to verify zeroing on release
        for (int i = 0; i < b.length; i++) {
            b[i] = (byte) (i + 1);
        }

        // Act: release should zero immediately to avoid leaks
        impl.releaseBuffer(b);

	VPEXTRW $17, X20, (SP)(AX*2)      // 62e37d0815244411 or 62e3fd0815244411
	VPEXTRW $127, X20, (SP)(AX*2)     // 62e37d081524447f or 62e3fd081524447f
	// EVEX: embedded zeroing.
	VADDPD.Z X30, X1, K7, X0  // 6291f58f58c6
	VMAXPD.Z (AX), Z2, K1, Z1 // 62f1edc95f08
	// EVEX: embedded rounding.
	VADDPD.RU_SAE Z3, Z2, K1, Z1   // 62f1ed5958cb
	VADDPD.RD_SAE Z3, Z2, K1, Z1   // 62f1ed3958cb

At the start of the function, the arguments are assumed
to be initialized but the results are assumed uninitialized.
If the results will hold live pointers during a call instruction,
the function should start by zeroing the results and then
executing the pseudo-instruction <code>GO_RESULTS_INITIALIZED</code>.
This instruction records that the results are now initialized
and should be scanned during stack movement and garbage collection.

During local development, there is a script that builds the site and checks for any changes, live-reloading:

<div class="termy">

```console
$ python ./scripts/docs.py live

<span style="color: green;">[INFO]</span> Serving on http://127.0.0.1:8008
<span style="color: green;">[INFO]</span> Start watching changes
<span style="color: green;">[INFO]</span> Start detecting changes
```

</div>

import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertFalse;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue;

/**
 * Unit tests for the {@link UpgradeResult} class.
 * Tests result creation, merging, and status determination.
 */
@DisplayName("UpgradeResult")
class UpgradeResultTest {

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Result Creation")
    class ResultCreationTests {

        @Test

#### Merging pull requests ####

Due to Guava's nature as a subset of Google's internal codebase which is
automatically synced to the public GitHub repository, we are unable to merge
pull requests directly into the master branch. Instead, once a pull request is
ready for merging, we'll make the appropriate changes in the internal codebase

import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Nonnull;
import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Comprehensive service interface for XML operations including node creation,
 * merging, reading, and writing.
 *
 * <p>This class provides XML merging functionality for Maven's XML handling
 * and specifies the combination modes that control how XML elements are merged.</p>
 *
 * <p>The merger supports two main types of combinations:</p>

  compileOptions {
    targetCompatibility(JavaVersion.VERSION_11)
    sourceCompatibility(JavaVersion.VERSION_11)
  }

  kotlinOptions {
    jvmTarget = JavaVersion.VERSION_11.toString()
  }

  // issue merging due to conflict with httpclient and something else
  packagingOptions.resources.excludes += setOf(
    "META-INF/DEPENDENCIES"
  )
}


dependencies {
  val okhttpLegacyVersion = "3.12.12"

                for (Plugin element : src) {
                    if (element.isInherited() || !element.getExecutions().isEmpty()) {
                        // NOTE: Enforce recursive merge to trigger merging/inheritance logic for executions
                        Plugin plugin = new Plugin();
                        plugin.setLocation("", element.getLocation(""));
                        plugin.setGroupId(null);

        // snapshot timestamp, or some other timestamp later encoded into the metadata.
        // TODO this needs to be repeated here so the merging doesn't interfere with the written metadata
        //  - we'd be much better having a pristine input, and an ongoing metadata for merging instead

        Map<ArtifactRepository, Metadata> previousMetadata = new HashMap<>();
        ArtifactRepository selected = null;