from fastapi.testclient import TestClient


async def security1(scopes: SecurityScopes):
    return scopes.scopes


async def security2(scopes: SecurityScopes):
    return scopes.scopes


async def dep3(
    dep1: Annotated[list[str], Security(security1, scopes=["scope1"])],
    dep2: Annotated[list[str], Security(security2, scopes=["scope2"])],
):
    return {"dep1": dep1, "dep2": dep2}


app = FastAPI()

## Abhängigkeitsbaum und Scopes { #dependency-tree-and-scopes }

Sehen wir uns diesen Abhängigkeitsbaum und die Scopes noch einmal an.

Da die Abhängigkeit `get_current_active_user` von `get_current_user` abhängt, wird der bei `get_current_active_user` deklarierte Scope `"me"` in die Liste der erforderlichen Scopes in `security_scopes.scopes` aufgenommen, das an `get_current_user` übergeben wird.

import static java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME;

/**
 * Meta-annotation that marks other annotations as scope annotations.
 * <p>
 * Scopes define the lifecycle and visibility of objects in the dependency injection
 * system. Custom scope annotations should be annotated with {@code @Scope}.
 * <p>
 * Built-in scopes include:
 * <ul>
 *   <li>{@link Singleton} - One instance per container</li>

## Token JWT con scopes { #jwt-token-with-scopes }

Ahora, modifica la *path operation* del token para devolver los scopes solicitados.

Todavía estamos usando el mismo `OAuth2PasswordRequestForm`. Incluye una propiedad `scopes` con una `list` de `str`, con cada scope que recibió en el request.

Y devolvemos los scopes como parte del token JWT.

/// danger | Peligro

Nevertheless, you still enforce those scopes, or any other security/authorization requirement, however you need, in your code.

In many cases, OAuth2 with scopes can be an overkill.

But if you know you need it, or you are curious, keep reading.

///

## OAuth2 scopes and OpenAPI { #oauth2-scopes-and-openapi }

Для этого используем `security_scopes.scopes`, содержащий `list` со всеми этими scopes как `str`.

{* ../../docs_src/security/tutorial005_an_py310.py hl[130:136] *}

## Дерево зависимостей и scopes { #dependency-tree-and-scopes }

Ещё раз рассмотрим дерево зависимостей и scopes.

                        * `security_scopes` 参数的属性 `scopes` 是包含上述声明的所有作用域的**列表**，因此：
                            * `security_scopes.scopes` 包含用于*路径操作*的 `["me", "items"]`
                            * `security_scopes.scopes` 包含*路径操作* `read_users_me` 的 `["me"]`，因为它在依赖项里被声明
                            * `security_scopes.scopes` 包含用于*路径操作* `read_system_status` 的 `[]`（空列表），并且它的依赖项 `get_current_user` 也没有声明任何 `scope`

/// tip | 提示

/// tip | Dica

A coisa importante e "mágica" aqui é que `get_current_user` terá diferentes listas de `scopes` para validar para cada *operação de rota*.

        if (scopeId == null || scopeId.isEmpty()) {
            scope = DependencyScope.COMPILE;
        } else {
            scope = DependencyScope.forId(scopeId);
        }
        return scope == null || !scope.isTransitive();
    }

    private Dependency merge(Dependency dep1, Dependency dep2) {
        throw new IllegalArgumentException("Duplicate dependency: " + getDependencyKey(dep1));
    }

    private Set<String> scopes;

    /**
     * Create a new filter with the specified scopes and their implied scopes enabled.
     *
     * @param scopes The scopes to enable, along with all implied scopes, may be {@code null}.
     */
    public CumulativeScopeArtifactFilter(Collection<String> scopes) {
        this.scopes = new HashSet<>();

        addScopes(scopes);
    }

    /**