ok = ok && set.Legacy()
	}
	return ok
}

func (z *erasureServerPools) BackendInfo() (b madmin.BackendInfo) {
	b.Type = madmin.Erasure

	scParity := globalStorageClass.GetParityForSC(storageclass.STANDARD)
	if scParity < 0 {
		scParity = z.serverPools[0].defaultParityCount
	}
	rrSCParity := globalStorageClass.GetParityForSC(storageclass.RRS)

	// Data blocks can vary per pool, but parity is same.

func ValidateParity(ssParity, setDriveCount int) error {
	// SS parity drives should be greater than or equal to minParityDrives.
	// Parity below minParityDrives is not supported.
	if ssParity > 0 && ssParity < minParityDrives {
		return fmt.Errorf("parity %d should be greater than or equal to %d",
			ssParity, minParityDrives)
	}

	if ssParity > setDriveCount/2 {

			// Ignore this parity since we don't have enough shards for read quorum
			continue
		}

		if occ > maxOcc {
			maxOcc = occ
			cparity = parity
		}
	}

	if maxOcc == 0 {
		// Did not found anything useful
		return -1
	}
	return cparity
}

func listObjectParities(partsMetadata []FileInfo, errs []error) (parities []int) {
	totalShards := len(partsMetadata)

Use correct Russian grammar — appropriate cases, suffixes, and endings depending on context.

For the following technical terms, use these specific translations to ensure consistency and clarity across the documentation:

* production (meaning production software or environment): продакшн (do not change the ending, for example, translate `in production` as `в продакшн` (not `в продакшене`))

            oplockLevelField.setAccessible(true);
            assertEquals(oplockLevel, oplockLevelField.get(notification));

            // Log the test for clarity
            logger.debug("Tested oplock level: {} ({})", oplockLevel, description);
        }

        private static Stream<Arguments> provideOplockLevels() {

 * reference. It allows you to represent "a {@code T} that must be present" and a "a {@code T} that
 * might be absent" as two distinct types in your program, which can aid clarity.
 *
 * <p>Some uses of this class include
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>As a method return type, as an alternative to returning {@code null} to indicate that no
 *       value was available

 * reference. It allows you to represent "a {@code T} that must be present" and a "a {@code T} that
 * might be absent" as two distinct types in your program, which can aid clarity.
 *
 * <p>Some uses of this class include
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>As a method return type, as an alternative to returning {@code null} to indicate that no
 *       value was available

 *   <li>Use of {@link java.util.Objects#requireNonNull(Object)} is generally discouraged, since
 *       {@link #verifyNotNull(Object)} and {@link Preconditions#checkNotNull(Object)} perform the
 *       same function with more clarity.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <h3>Warning about performance</h3>
 *
 * <p>Remember that parameter values for message construction must all be computed eagerly, and

 *   <li>Use of {@link java.util.Objects#requireNonNull(Object)} is generally discouraged, since
 *       {@link #verifyNotNull(Object)} and {@link Preconditions#checkNotNull(Object)} perform the
 *       same function with more clarity.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <h3>Warning about performance</h3>
 *
 * <p>Remember that parameter values for message construction must all be computed eagerly, and

   */
  private static boolean validatePart(String part, boolean isFinalPart) {

    // These tests could be collapsed into one big boolean expression, but
    // they have been left as independent tests for clarity.

    if (part.length() < 1 || part.length() > MAX_DOMAIN_PART_LENGTH) {
      return false;
    }

    /*
     * GWT claims to support java.lang.Character's char-classification methods, but it actually only