if (to instanceof WildcardType) {
          return; // Okay to say Foo is <?>
        }
        // Can't map from a raw class to anything other than itself or a wildcard.
        // You can't say "assuming String is Integer".
        // And we don't support "assuming String is T"; user has to say "assuming T is String".

        if (to instanceof WildcardType) {
          return; // Okay to say Foo is <?>
        }
        // Can't map from a raw class to anything other than itself or a wildcard.
        // You can't say "assuming String is Integer".
        // And we don't support "assuming String is T"; user has to say "assuming T is String".

@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class CollectionSerializationEqualTester<E> extends AbstractCollectionTester<E> {
  @CollectionFeature.Require(SERIALIZABLE)
  /*
   * As the class docs say, this test only makes sense for collections that define equals().
   * Accordingly, our testing framework adds it only when testing an implementation of List, Set, or
   * Multiset.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("UndefinedEquals")

 * or method references instead of classes, leaving your code easier to migrate in the future.
 *
 * <p>To use an existing supplier instance (say, named {@code supplier}) in a context where the
 * <i>other type</i> of supplier is expected, use the method reference {@code supplier::get}. A

  public void clear() {
    synchronized (lock) {
      list.clear();
    }
  }

  /** Returns a snapshot of the logged records. */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): consider higher-level APIs here (say, assertNoRecordsLogged(),
   * getOnlyRecordLogged(), getAndClearLogRecords()...)
   *
   * TODO(cpovirk): consider renaming this method to reflect that it takes a snapshot (and/or return
   * an ImmutableList)
   */

@DoNotMock("Use ImmutableRangeMap or TreeRangeMap")
@GwtIncompatible
public interface RangeMap<K extends Comparable, V> {
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): These docs sometimes say "map" and sometimes say "range map." Pick one, or at
   * least decide on a policy for when to use which.
   */

  /**
   * Returns the value associated with the specified key, or {@code null} if there is no such value.
   *

 * presented below:
 *
 * <pre>
 * void runManyThings({@literal List<ThingToRun>} thingsToRun) {
 *   for (ThingToRun thingToRun : thingsToRun) {
 *     thingToRun.run(); // say this may throw an exception, but you want to
 *                       // always run all thingsToRun
 *   }
 * }
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>This is what the code would become:
 *
 * <pre>

  public void clear() {
    synchronized (lock) {
      list.clear();
    }
  }

  /** Returns a snapshot of the logged records. */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): consider higher-level APIs here (say, assertNoRecordsLogged(),
   * getOnlyRecordLogged(), getAndClearLogRecords()...)
   *
   * TODO(cpovirk): consider renaming this method to reflect that it takes a snapshot (and/or return
   * an ImmutableList)
   */

 * presented below:
 *
 * <pre>
 * void runManyThings({@literal List<ThingToRun>} thingsToRun) {
 *   for (ThingToRun thingToRun : thingsToRun) {
 *     thingToRun.run(); // say this may throw an exception, but you want to
 *                       // always run all thingsToRun
 *   }
 * }
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>This is what the code would become:
 *
 * <pre>

   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in set(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getSetNullSupportedMethod() {
    return getMethod(ListSetTester.class, "testSet_null");