- Fixed a scheduler preemption issue where the victim pod was not deleted due to incorrect status patching. This issue occurred when the preemptor and victim pods had different QoS classes in their status, causing the preemption to fail entirely. ([#126644](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/126644), [@Huang-Wei](https://github.com/Huang-Wei))

### Bug or Regression

- Fix a scheduler preemption issue where the victim pod was not deleted due to incorrect status patching. This issue occurred when the preemptor and victim pods had different QoS classes in their status, causing the preemption to fail entirely. ([#126694](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/126694), [@Huang-Wei](https://github.com/Huang-Wei)) [SIG Scheduling]

### Bug or Regression

- Fix a scheduler preemption issue where the victim pod was not deleted due to incorrect status patching. This issue occurred when the preemptor and victim pods had different QoS classes in their status, causing the preemption to fail entirely. ([#126693](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/126693), [@Huang-Wei](https://github.com/Huang-Wei)) [SIG Scheduling]

- Fixed a bug that the async preemption feature keeps preemptor pods unnecessarily in the queue. ([#133167](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/133167), [@sanposhiho](https://github.com/sanposhiho)) [SIG Scheduling]

### Bug or Regression

- Fix a scheduler preemption issue where the victim pod was not deleted due to incorrect status patching. This issue occurred when the preemptor and victim pods had different QoS classes in their status, causing the preemption to fail entirely. ([#126695](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/126695), [@Huang-Wei](https://github.com/Huang-Wei)) [SIG Scheduling]

### Bug or Regression

- Fix a scheduler preemption issue where the victim pod was not deleted due to incorrect status patching. This issue occurred when the preemptor and victim pods had different QoS classes in their status, causing the preemption to fail entirely. ([#126691](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/126691), [@Huang-Wei](https://github.com/Huang-Wei)) [SIG Scheduling]

 - Pods that are considered for preemption and haven't started don't produce an error log. ([#90241](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/90241), [@alculquicondor](https://github.com/alculquicondor)) [SIG Scheduling]

- Graduated the asynchronous preemption feature in the scheduler to beta. 
  Now the feature flag (SchedulerAsyncPreemption) is enabled by default. ([#130550](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/130550), [@sanposhiho](https://github.com/sanposhiho)) [SIG Scheduling]

 * for (Challenge challenge : response.challenges()) {
 *   // If this is preemptive auth, use a preemptive credential.
 *   if (challenge.scheme().equalsIgnoreCase("OkHttp-Preemptive")) {
 *     return response.request().newBuilder()
 *         .header("Proxy-Authorization", "secret")
 *         .build();
 *   }
 * }
 * return null; // Didn't find a preemptive auth scheme.
 * ```
 *
 * ## Reactive Authentication
 *

        .request(proxyConnectRequest)
        .protocol(Protocol.HTTP_1_1)
        .code(HttpURLConnection.HTTP_PROXY_AUTH)
        .message("Preemptive Authenticate")
        .sentRequestAtMillis(-1L)
        .receivedResponseAtMillis(-1L)
        .header("Proxy-Authenticate", "OkHttp-Preemptive")
        .build()

    val authenticatedRequest =
      route.address.proxyAuthenticator