assertEquals(createSet(new Object[] {a.artifact, modifiedC}), res.getArtifacts(), "Check artifact list");
        Artifact artifact = getArtifact("c", res.getArtifacts());
        // local wins now, and irrelevant if not local as test/provided aren't transitive
        // assertEquals( Artifact.SCOPE_COMPILE, artifact.getArtifactScope(), "Check artifactScope" );

    graph = ValueGraphBuilder.directed().build();
    IllegalArgumentException e =
        assertThrows(
            IllegalArgumentException.class,
            () -> graph.putEdgeValue(EndpointPair.unordered(1, 2), "irrelevant"));
    assertThat(e).hasMessageThat().contains(ENDPOINTS_MISMATCH);
  }

  @Test
  public void putEdgeValue_undirected_orderMismatch() {
    graph = ValueGraphBuilder.undirected().build();

        byte[] header = buildSmb2Header();
        byte[] body = new byte[2 + 2 + 4];
        // Wrong structure size (e.g., 0)
        SMBUtil.writeInt2(0, body, 0);
        // The rest of the fields are irrelevant since it should fail early
        byte[] packet = buildPacket(header, body, null, null);

        assertThrows(SMBProtocolDecodingException.class, () -> resp.decode(packet, 0, false));
    }

    graph = ValueGraphBuilder.directed().build();
    IllegalArgumentException e =
        assertThrows(
            IllegalArgumentException.class,
            () -> graph.putEdgeValue(EndpointPair.unordered(1, 2), "irrelevant"));
    assertThat(e).hasMessageThat().contains(ENDPOINTS_MISMATCH);
  }

  @Test
  public void putEdgeValue_undirected_orderMismatch() {
    graph = ValueGraphBuilder.undirected().build();

// authentication algorithms. Note that this doesn't include certificate types
// since those use the underlying algorithm. This list is sent to the client if
// it supports the server-sig-algs extension. Order is irrelevant.
// https://cs.opensource.google/go/x/crypto/+/refs/tags/v0.22.0:ssh/common.go;l=142
var supportedPubKeyAuthAlgos = []string{
	ssh.KeyAlgoED25519,
	ssh.KeyAlgoSKED25519, ssh.KeyAlgoSKECDSA256,

   * doesn't. Additionally, the order in which nodes or edges are added to the graph, and the order
   * in which they are iterated over, are irrelevant.
   *
   * <p>A reference implementation of this is provided by {@link AbstractValueGraph#equals(Object)}.
   */
  @Override
  boolean equals(@Nullable Object object);

  /**

    builder.build(CacheLoader.from(Suppliers.ofInstance(null)));
  }

  public void testDisableCaching() {
    // Functional test: assert that CacheBuilderSpec.disableCaching()
    // disables caching.  It's irrelevant how it does so.
    CacheBuilder<Object, Object> builder = CacheBuilder.from(CacheBuilderSpec.disableCaching());
    Object key = new Object();
    Object value = new Object();
    LoadingCache<Object, Object> cache =

   * doesn't. Additionally, the order in which nodes or edges are added to the graph, and the order
   * in which they are iterated over, are irrelevant.
   *
   * <p>A reference implementation of this is provided by {@link AbstractGraph#equals(Object)}.
   */
  @Override
  boolean equals(@Nullable Object object);

  /**

   * other doesn't. Additionally, the order in which nodes or edges are added to the network, and
   * the order in which they are iterated over, are irrelevant.
   *
   * <p>A reference implementation of this is provided by {@link AbstractNetwork#equals(Object)}.
   */
  @Override
  boolean equals(@Nullable Object object);

  /**

from its use with <code>SB</code>, where it is an offset from the symbol.)
The assembler enforces this convention, rejecting plain <code>0(FP)</code> and <code>8(FP)</code>.
The actual name is semantically irrelevant but should be used to document
the argument's name.
It is worth stressing that <code>FP</code> is always a
pseudo-register, not a hardware
register, even on architectures with a hardware frame pointer.
</p>