}
	webhook := whs[0]
	for i := range webhook.Webhooks {
		wh := webhook.Webhooks[i]
		// this is an abomination, but if this isn't a per-revision webhook, we want to make it ineffectual
		// without deleting it. Add a nonsense match.
		wh.NamespaceSelector = util.NeverMatch
		wh.ObjectSelector = util.NeverMatch
		webhook.Webhooks[i] = wh
	}
	admit := client.AdmissionregistrationV1().MutatingWebhookConfigurations()

    .build();
```

Client Authentication
---------------------

The above scenario is representative of most TLS set ups: the client uses certificates to validate
the identity of a server. The converse is also possible. Here we create a server that authenticates
a client and a client that authenticates a server.

```java
// Create the root for client and server to trust. We could also use different roots for each!

public final class HostAndPort implements Serializable {
  /** Magic value indicating the absence of a port number. */
  private static final int NO_PORT = -1;

  /** Hostname, IPv4/IPv6 literal, or unvalidated nonsense. */
  private final String host;

  /** Validated port number in the range [0..65535], or NO_PORT */
  private final int port;

  /** True if the parsed host has colons, but no surrounding brackets. */

            url = "file://" + url.substring("file:".length());
        }

        // So now we have an url of the form file://<path>

        // We want to eliminate any relative path nonsense and lock down the path so we
        // need to fully resolve it before any submodules use the path. This can happen
        // when you are using a custom settings.xml that contains a relative path entry

     * an int.
     */
    checkNonNegative("a", a);
    checkNonNegative("b", b);
    if (a == 0) {
      // 0 % b == 0, so b divides a, but the converse doesn't hold.
      // BigInteger.gcd is consistent with this decision.
      return b;
    } else if (b == 0) {
      return a; // similar logic
    }
    /*

   *       contained by the latter range)
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>Note that if {@code a.encloses(b)}, then {@code b.contains(v)} implies {@code
   * a.contains(v)}, but as the last two examples illustrate, the converse is not always true.
   *
   * <p>Being reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, the {@code encloses} relation defines a
   * <i>partial order</i> over ranges. There exists a unique {@linkplain Range#all maximal} range

     * int.
     */
    checkNonNegative("a", a);
    checkNonNegative("b", b);
    if (a == 0) {
      // 0 % b == 0, so b divides a, but the converse doesn't hold.
      // BigInteger.gcd is consistent with this decision.
      return b;
    } else if (b == 0) {
      return a; // similar logic
    }
    /*

          }
        };

    static boolean intersect(Set<?> a, Set<?> b) {
      return !intersection(a, b).isEmpty();
    }

    /**
     * Like {@code inputs.toString()}, but with the nonsense {@code toString} representations
     * replaced with the name of each future from {@link #allFutures}.
     */
    String smartToString(ImmutableSet<ListenableFuture<String>> inputs) {

          }
        };

    static boolean intersect(Set<?> a, Set<?> b) {
      return !intersection(a, b).isEmpty();
    }

    /**
     * Like {@code inputs.toString()}, but with the nonsense {@code toString} representations
     * replaced with the name of each future from {@link #allFutures}.
     */
    String smartToString(ImmutableSet<ListenableFuture<String>> inputs) {