execution it sees that the classpath has changed, and so to be
       safe, it needs to re-run.

       - This is unfortunate, because actually it would be safe to declare
       the task as up-to-date, because these two files, which are based on
       the generated index.xml, are outputs, not inputs. We can be sure of
       this because they are deleted in the @BeforeEach method of the

    /**
     * This event means that the artifactScope has NOT been updated to a farther node artifactScope because current
     * node is in the first level pom
     *
     * @param artifact     current node artifact, the one in the first level pom
     * @param ignoredScope artifactScope that was ignored because artifact was in first level pom
     */
    void updateScopeCurrentPom(Artifact artifact, String ignoredScope);

            "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.",
            "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.",
            "The process cannot access the file because another process has locked a portion of the file.", "The disk is full.",

            "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.",
            "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.",
            "The process cannot access the file because another process has locked a portion of the file.", "The disk is full.",

  // Use fewer steps in the ListIteratorTester in ListListIteratorTester because it's slow in prod
  // mode.
  static int listListIteratorTesterNumIterations() {
    // TODO(hhchan): It's 4 in java.  Figure out why even 3 is too slow in prod mode.
    return 2;
  }

  // Use fewer steps in the IteratorTester in CollectionIteratorTester because it's slow in prod
  // mode.
  static int collectionIteratorTesterNumIterations() {

                            * `security_scopes.scopes` will contain `["me"]` for the *path operation* `read_users_me`, because it is declared in the dependency `get_current_active_user`.
                            * `security_scopes.scopes` will contain `[]` (nothing) for the *path operation* `read_system_status`, because it didn't declare any `Security` with `scopes`, and its dependency, `get_current_user`, doesn't declare any `scopes` either.

/// tip

So, during that time, the computer can go and do some other work, while "slow-file" 📝 finishes.

Then the computer / program 🤖 will come back every time it has a chance because it's waiting again, or whenever it 🤖 finished all the work it had at that point. And it 🤖 will see if any of the tasks it was waiting for have already finished, doing whatever it had to do.

          only-labels: "stat:awaiting response"
          stale-issue-message: > 
            This issue is stale because it has been open for 7 days with no activity.
            It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you.
          close-issue-message: >
            This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 7 days since being marked as stale.
            Please reopen if you'd like to work on this further.

abstract class EndpointPairIterator<N> extends AbstractIterator<EndpointPair<N>> {
  private final BaseGraph<N> graph;
  private final Iterator<N> nodeIterator;

  @Nullable N node = null; // null is safe as an initial value because graphs don't allow null nodes

  Iterator<N> successorIterator = ImmutableSet.<N>of().iterator();

  static <N> EndpointPairIterator<N> of(BaseGraph<N> graph) {

    int NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND = 0xC000003a;
    /** The object path syntax is bad */
    int NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_SYNTAX_BAD = 0xC000003b;
    /** The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process */
    int NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION = 0xC0000043;
    /** The file is pending deletion */
    int NT_STATUS_DELETE_PENDING = 0xC0000056;