}

	for i := 0; i < config.Toys; i++ {
		user.Toys = append(user.Toys, Toy{Name: name + "_toy_" + strconv.Itoa(i+1)})
	}

	for i := 0; i < config.Tools; i++ {
		user.Tools = append(user.Tools, Tools{Name: name + "_tool_" + strconv.Itoa(i+1)})
	}

	if config.Company {
		user.Company = Company{Name: "company-" + name}
	}

	if config.Manager {

import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Experimental;
import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Immutable;

/**
 * Represents most common tools supported by CLIng.
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Immutable
@Experimental
public final class Tools {
    private Tools() {}

    public static final String MVN_CMD = "mvn";
    public static final String MVN_NAME = "Maven";

## Tools {#tools}

<!-- go.dev/issue/77177 -->

Response file (`@file`) parsing is now supported for the `compile`, `link`, `asm`, `cgo`, `cover`, and `pack` tools.
The response file contains whitespace-separated arguments with support for single-quoted and double-quoted strings, escape sequences, and backslash-newline line continuation.
The format is compatible with GCC's response file implementation to ensure interoperability with existing build systems.

# Other Tools

## uv

If uv is available, use it to manage dependencies.

## Ruff

If Ruff is available, use it to lint and format the code. Consider enabling the FastAPI rules.

## ty

If ty is available, use it to check types.

## Asyncer

When needing to run blocking code inside of async functions, or async code inside of blocking functions, suggest using Asyncer.

Prefer it over AnyIO or asyncio.

Install:

 * specific language governing permissions and limitations
 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven.api;

import javax.tools.DocumentationTool;
import javax.tools.JavaFileManager;
import javax.tools.StandardLocation;

import java.io.File;
import java.nio.file.Path;
import java.util.Objects;
import java.util.Optional;
import java.util.StringJoiner;

    @Nonnull
    static Builder mvn(@Nonnull List<String> args, @Nonnull MessageBuilderFactory messageBuilderFactory) {
        return builder(Tools.MVN_CMD, Tools.MVN_NAME, args, messageBuilderFactory);
    }

    /**
     * Creates a new Builder instance for constructing a Maven Encrypting Tool ParserRequest.
     *
     * @param args the command-line arguments
     * @param messageBuilderFactory the factory for creating message builders

Wenn Sie die Benchmarks ansehen, ist es üblich, dass mehrere Tools unterschiedlichen Typs als gleichwertig verglichen werden.

Insbesondere dass Uvicorn, Starlette und FastAPI zusammen verglichen werden (neben vielen anderen Tools).

Je einfacher das Problem, das durch das Tool gelöst wird, desto besser wird die Performanz sein. Und die meisten Benchmarks testen nicht die zusätzlichen Funktionen, die das Tool bietet.

Die Hierarchie ist wie folgt:

 *   <li>Dependency version management</li>
 *   <li>Configuration migration</li>
 *   <li>Interactive upgrade workflows</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * @see org.apache.maven.api.cli.Tools#MVNUP_CMD
 * @see org.apache.maven.api.cli.Tools#MVNUP_NAME
 * @since 4.0.0
 */

When you check the benchmarks, it is common to see several tools of different types compared as equivalent.

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server

# Policy on AI-Assisted Contributions to the Gradle Build Tool

We use AI tools daily and welcome AI-assisted contributions—provided the human behind them meets the standards below.

## Why this policy exists

There is a fundamental **asymmetry** between submitting a contribution and reviewing one: AI tools make it easy to generate and submit large amounts of code, but they do not make it equally faster for us to review it.