<i class="fa fa-search" aria-hidden="true"></i>
						</button>
					</div>
				</div>
			</form>
		</c:if>
		<nav class="mt-2">

		<ul class="nav nav-pills nav-sidebar flex-column" data-widget="treeview" role="menu">
			<li class="nav-header"><la:message key="labels.sidebar.menu" /></li>
			<c:if test="${fe:permission('admin-dashboard-view')}">
				<li class="nav-item">

    for review in reviews:
        if review.user.login in review_by_user:
            stored_review = review_by_user[review.user.login]
            if review.submitted_at >= stored_review.submitted_at:
                review_by_user[review.user.login] = review
        else:
            review_by_user[review.user.login] = review
    approved_reviews = [

3. **Flow**:
   - Review promptly to avoid blocking progress.
   - Balance quality and speed—minor issues can be addressed later via issues, not PR blocks.
   - If unable to complete the review, tag another reviewer (e.g., `@username please take over`).

4. **Shared Responsibility**:
   - All MinIO contributors are reviewers. The first commenter on a PR owns the review unless they delegate.

* They are rarely updated after creation and initial review, and then become hard to follow, especially after important decisions are made
* They are not synced with the code to reflect the eventual solution that is committed
* Google Docs is not a "code-oriented" tool, like Markdown can be
* Review in Google Docs is not as simple as a PR code review in GitHub

## Decision

3. **Actively collaborate with us.** We commit real time and attention to everything we review. Low-effort submissions—where code is generated, submitted, and abandoned—waste our limited review capacity.

## What contributors can expect from us

            if label.name == "lang-all":
                is_lang = True
                break
        for review in pr.reviews.nodes:
            if review.author:
                authors[review.author.login] = review.author
                if is_lang:
                    translation_reviewers[review.author.login] += 1
        if pr.state == "MERGED" and pr.author:
            if is_lang:

* Suggest a new **feature**.

**Note**: if you do it, then I'm going to ask you to also help others. 😉

## Review Pull Requests { #review-pull-requests }

You can help me review pull requests from others.

Again, please try your best to be kind. 🤗

---

Here's what to keep in mind and how to review a pull request:

### Understand the problem { #understand-the-problem }

        This allows us to keep them consistent and up-to-date.

        If there are several native speakers commenting on this discussion and
        committing to help review new translations, the FastAPI team will review it

* Add the specific language label.
* Add the label `awaiting-review`.

The label `awaiting-review` is special, only used for translations. A GitHub Action will detect it, then it will read the language label, and it will update the GitHub Discussions managing the translations for that language to notify people that there's a new translation to review.

the pull requests by the ones with the label for your language. For example, for Spanish, the label is [`lang-es`](https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc+label%3Alang-es+label%3Aawaiting-review).

You can also review already merged translation PRs. To do this, go to the [closed pull requests](https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed) and filter by your language label. For example, for Spanish, you can use [`lang-es`](https://githu...