getLogger().debug("Exception", e);
                    } finally {
                        updateCheckManager.touch(metadata, repository, file);
                    }
                }

                // TODO should this be inside the above check?
                // touch file so that this is not checked again until interval has passed
                if (file.exists()) {

    assertTrue(temp.exists());
    assertTrue(temp.delete());
    assertFalse(temp.exists());
    Files.touch(temp);
    assertTrue(temp.exists());
    Files.touch(temp);
    assertTrue(temp.exists());

    assertThrows(
        IOException.class,
        () ->
            Files.touch(
                new File(temp.getPath()) {
                  @Override

        File touchFile = getTouchfile(artifact);
        return getError(touchFile, getRepositoryKey(repository));
    }

    @Override
    public void touch(Artifact artifact, ArtifactRepository repository, String error) {
        File file = artifact.getFile();

        File touchfile = getTouchfile(artifact);

        if (file.exists()) {

          operations-per-run: 50
          ascending: true
          exempt-all-milestones: true

          # ISSUES (deactivated) ----------------------------------------------
          # This workflow should touch no issues, so times are set to -1
          # (see actions/stale documentation for the behavior)
          days-before-issue-stale: -1
          stale-issue-label: stale
          stale-issue-message: >

        // Assert
        assertSame(handle, got, "getHandle should expose the same instance passed to constructor");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("close does nothing and does not touch handle")
    void close_doesNothing() throws Exception {
        // Arrange
        SmbPipeOutputStream out = newStream();
        // constructor already calls handle.getPipe(); clear interactions to focus on close()

<img src="/img/tutorial/cookie-param-models/image01.png">
</div>

/// info

Have in mind that, as **browsers handle cookies** in special ways and behind the scenes, they **don't** easily allow **JavaScript** to touch them.

If you go to the **API docs UI** at `/docs` you will be able to see the **documentation** for cookies for your *path operations*.

                            policy.getChecksumPolicy(),
                            false);

                    updateCheckManager.touch(artifact, repository, null);
                } catch (ResourceDoesNotExistException e) {
                    updateCheckManager.touch(artifact, repository, null);
                    throw e;
                } catch (TransferFailedException e) {

   * methods ensure that null is never present in the map, it's OK for the
   * comparator to look for it wherever it wants.
   *
   * Note that we do NOT touch the comparator returned by comparator(), which
   * should be identical to the one the user passed in. We touch only the
   * "secret" comparator used by the delegate implementation.
   */

              $(location @local_config_def_file_filter//:def_file_filter) \\
              --input $(location :tensorflow_def_file) \\
              --output $@
          """,
        "//conditions:default": "touch $@",  # Just a placeholder for Unix platforms
    }),
    tools = ["@local_config_def_file_filter//:def_file_filter"],
    visibility = ["//visibility:public"],
)

And now, we can use `__init__` to declare the parameters of the instance that we can use to "parameterize" the dependency:

{* ../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial011_an_py39.py hl[9] *}

In this case, **FastAPI** won't ever touch or care about `__init__`, we will use it directly in our code.

## Create an instance { #create-an-instance }

We could create an instance of this class with: