George Sterpu, Gianluca Varisco, Gleb Popov, Greg Peatfield, Guillaume Klein,
Gurpreet Singh, Gustavo Lima Chaves, Gyoung-Yoon Ryoo, haison, Hanton Yang,
HanGuo97, Haraldur TóMas HallgríMsson, Hari Shankar, hehongliang, Heungsub Lee,
Hoeseong Kim, Huan Li (李卓桓), HåKon Sandsmark, I-Hong, I-Hong Jhuo, Ilham
Firdausi Putra, Ilango R, Imran Salam, Innovimax, Jacky Ko, Irene Dea, Ivan

import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Unit tests for {@link ExecutionList}.
 *
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @author Sven Mawson
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class ExecutionListTest extends TestCase {

  private final ExecutionList list = new ExecutionList();

  public void testRunOnPopulatedList() throws Exception {

import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Unit tests for {@link ExecutionList}.
 *
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @author Sven Mawson
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class ExecutionListTest extends TestCase {

  private final ExecutionList list = new ExecutionList();

  public void testRunOnPopulatedList() throws Exception {

import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Unit tests for {@link Futures#transformAsync(ListenableFuture, AsyncFunction, Executor)}.
 *
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class FuturesTransformAsyncTest extends AbstractChainedListenableFutureTest<String> {
  protected static final int SLOW_OUTPUT_VALID_INPUT_DATA = 2;

import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Unit tests for {@link Futures#transformAsync(ListenableFuture, AsyncFunction, Executor)}.
 *
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class FuturesTransformAsyncTest extends AbstractChainedListenableFutureTest<String> {
  protected static final int SLOW_OUTPUT_VALID_INPUT_DATA = 2;

 * JdkFutureAdapters}. However, when possible, it is more efficient and reliable to create a {@code
 * ListenableFuture} directly.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @since 1.0
 */
/*
 * Some of the annotations below were added after we released our separate
 * com.google.guava:listenablefuture:1.0 artifact. (For more on that artifact, see

 * JdkFutureAdapters}. However, when possible, it is more efficient and reliable to create a {@code
 * ListenableFuture} directly.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @since 1.0
 */
/*
 * Some of the annotations below were added after we released our separate
 * com.google.guava:listenablefuture:1.0 artifact. (For more on that artifact, see

 * JdkFutureAdapters}. However, when possible, it is more efficient and reliable to create a {@code
 * ListenableFuture} directly.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @since 1.0
 */
/*
 * Some of the annotations below were added after we released our separate
 * com.google.guava:listenablefuture:1.0 artifact. (For more on that artifact, see

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>If you do chain your operations manually, you may want to use {@link FluentFuture}.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @since 1.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
public final class Futures extends GwtFuturesCatchingSpecialization {

  // A note on memory visibility.

  }

  TF_Status* s_;

 private:
  TF_Graph* graph_;
  int counter_;
};

// Helper macros for the TF_OperationGetAttr* tests.
// TODO(ashankar): Use gmock matchers instead?
// (https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md#writing-new-parameterized-matchers-quickly)
// That will require setting up the tensorflow build with gmock.