reviews = list(pr.get_reviews())
    review_by_user: dict[str, PullRequestReview] = {}
    for review in reviews:
        if review.user.login in review_by_user:
            stored_review = review_by_user[review.user.login]
            if review.submitted_at >= stored_review.submitted_at:
                review_by_user[review.user.login] = review
        else:

3. **Flow**:
   - Review promptly to avoid blocking progress.
   - Balance quality and speed—minor issues can be addressed later via issues, not PR blocks.
   - If unable to complete the review, tag another reviewer (e.g., `@username please take over`).

4. **Shared Responsibility**:
   - All MinIO contributors are reviewers. The first commenter on a PR owns the review unless they delegate.

* Suggest a new **feature**.

**Note**: if you do it, then I'm going to ask you to also help others. 😉

## Review Pull Requests { #review-pull-requests }

You can help me review pull requests from others.

Again, please try your best to be kind. 🤗

---

Here's what to keep in mind and how to review a pull request:

### Understand the problem { #understand-the-problem }

* They are rarely updated after creation and initial review, and then become hard to follow, especially after important decisions are made
* They are not synced with the code to reflect the eventual solution that is committed
* Google Docs is not a "code-oriented" tool, like Markdown can be
* Review in Google Docs is not as simple as a PR code review in GitHub

## Decision

* Add the specific language label.
* Add the label `awaiting-review`.

The label `awaiting-review` is special, only used for translations. A GitHub Action will detect it, then it will read the language label, and it will update the GitHub Discussions managing the translations for that language to notify people that there's a new translation to review.

        This allows us to keep them consistent and up-to-date.

        If there are several native speakers commenting on this discussion and
        committing to help review new translations, the FastAPI team will review it

issue if there is one) requesting the feature and describing specific use cases
for it.

If we decide to pursue a feature request, it will go through a thorough process
of API design and review. Any code should come after this.

[APIs]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/API
[issue]: https://github.com/google/guava/issues

Pull requests
-------------

I (the author, [@tiangolo](https://x.com/tiangolo)) will review it thoroughly and get back to you.

## Public Discussions

Please restrain from publicly discussing a potential security vulnerability. 🙊

      env:
        TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
        CONFIG: >
          {
            "approved-1":
              {
                "number": 1,
                "await_label": "awaiting-review"
              }

* **Embrace modern AI coding practices**: Leave everything up to an LLM to decide. The model knows best. Always.
* **No code reviews**: There's no code to review. No PRs to approve. No comments to address. Embrace vibe coding fully, replace the theater of approving and merging vibe coded PRs that no one looks at with full proper vibes only.

/// tip