import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import org.mockito.Mockito;

import jcifs.CIFSContext;
import jcifs.Configuration;
import jcifs.Credentials;

/**
 * Security-focused test cases for SmbSessionImpl to verify race condition fixes.
 */
public class SmbSessionImplSecurityTest {

    private CIFSContext mockContext;
    private SmbTransportImpl mockTransport;
    private Configuration mockConfig;

  fun computeIfAbsentWhenDifferentKeyRaceLostDuringCompute() {
    val tags = EmptyTags
    val atomicTags = AtomicReference<Tags>(tags)
    val result =
      atomicTags.computeIfAbsent(String::class) {
        // 'Race' by making another computeIfAbsent call. In practice this would be another thread.
        assertThat(atomicTags.computeIfAbsent(Integer::class) { 5 as Integer }).isEqualTo(5)
        "a"
      }

 *
 *  3. Attempt plans from prior connect attempts for this call. These occur as either follow-ups to
 *     failed connect attempts (such as trying the next [ConnectionSpec]), or as attempts that lost
 *     a race in fast follow-up.
 *
 *  4. If there's no existing connection, make a list of routes (which may require blocking DNS
 *     lookups) and attempt new connections to them. When failures occur, retries iterate the

    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> multiset.add(KEY, COUNT_TO_ADD));
  }

  /**
   * Simulate some of the races that can happen on add. We can't easily simulate the race that
   * happens when an {@link AtomicInteger#compareAndSet} fails, but we can simulate the case where
   * the putIfAbsent returns a non-null value, and the case where the replace() of an observed zero
   * fails.
   */

      "plan 1 TLS connected",
    )

    taskFaker.assertNoMoreTasks()
  }

  /**
   * This test performs two races:
   *
   *  * The first race is between plan0 and plan1, with a 250 ms head start for plan0.
   *  * The second race is between plan2 and plan3, with a 250 ms head start for plan2.
   *
   * We get plan0 and plan1 from the route planner.

  /**
   * This test is for a case where two Service.Listener callbacks for the same service would call
   * transitionService in the wrong order due to a race. Due to the fact that it is a race this test
   * isn't guaranteed to expose the issue, but it is at least likely to become flaky if the race
   * sneaks back in, and in this case flaky means something is definitely wrong.
   *

   * on the fields of TimeoutFuture. This field is slightly different from the fields discussed
   * there: cancel() never reads this field, only writes to it. That makes the race here completely
   * harmless, rather than just 99.99% harmless.
   */
  @LazyInit private @Nullable List<@Nullable Present<V>> values;

  @SuppressWarnings("EmptyList") // ImmutableList doesn't support nullable element types

   * on the fields of TimeoutFuture. This field is slightly different from the fields discussed
   * there: cancel() never reads this field, only writes to it. That makes the race here completely
   * harmless, rather than just 99.99% harmless.
   */
  @LazyInit private @Nullable List<@Nullable Present<V>> values;

  @SuppressWarnings("EmptyList") // ImmutableList doesn't support nullable element types

    }

    // If we successfully add the computed element, we're done.
    val newTags = tags.plus(type, computed)
    if (compareAndSet(tags, newTags)) return computed

    // We lost the race. Possibly to other code that was putting a *different* key. Try again!
  }

  internal val connectionSpecIndex: Int,
  internal val isTlsFallback: Boolean,
) : RoutePlanner.Plan,
  ExchangeCodec.Carrier {
  /** True if this connect was canceled; typically because it lost a race. */
  @Volatile private var canceled = false

  // These properties are initialized by connect() and never reassigned.

  /** The low-level TCP socket. */
  private var rawSocket: JavaNetSocket? = null

  /**