lt: Annotated[
        float | None,
        Doc(
            """
            Less than. If set, value must be less than this. Only applicable to numbers.
            """
        ),
    ] = None,
    le: Annotated[
        float | None,
        Doc(
            """
            Less than or equal. If set, value must be less than or equal to this.
            Only applicable to numbers.
            """
        ),

## Number validations: greater than and less than or equal { #number-validations-greater-than-and-less-than-or-equal }

The same applies for:

* `gt`: `g`reater `t`han
* `le`: `l`ess than or `e`qual

{* ../../docs_src/path_params_numeric_validations/tutorial005_an_py310.py hl[10] *}

## Number validations: floats, greater than and less than { #number-validations-floats-greater-than-and-less-than }

     * In that explanation's notation, our `overlap` check would be `x1 < y2 && y1 < x2`. We've
     * flipped one part of the check so that we're using "less than" in both cases (rather than a
     * mix of "less than" and "greater than"). We've also switched to "strictly less than" rather
     * than "less than or equal to" because of *handwave* the difference between "endpoints of
     * inclusive ranges" and "Cuts."
     */

            assertTrue(Smb2Constants.SMB2_DIALECT_0202 < Smb2Constants.SMB2_DIALECT_0210, "SMB 2.0.2 should be less than SMB 2.1");
            assertTrue(Smb2Constants.SMB2_DIALECT_0210 < Smb2Constants.SMB2_DIALECT_0300, "SMB 2.1 should be less than SMB 3.0");
            assertTrue(Smb2Constants.SMB2_DIALECT_0300 < Smb2Constants.SMB2_DIALECT_0302, "SMB 3.0 should be less than SMB 3.0.2");

	for range dynamicTimeoutLogSize {
		timeout.LogSuccess(20 * time.Second)
	}

	adjusted := timeout.Timeout()

	if initial <= adjusted {
		t.Errorf("Failure to decrease timeout, expected %v to be less than %v", adjusted, initial)
	}
}

func TestDynamicTimeoutDualDecrease(t *testing.T) {
	timeout := newDynamicTimeout(time.Minute, time.Second)

	initial := timeout.Timeout()

	for range dynamicTimeoutLogSize {

     * In that explanation's notation, our `overlap` check would be `x1 < y2 && y1 < x2`. We've
     * flipped one part of the check so that we're using "less than" in both cases (rather than a
     * mix of "less than" and "greater than"). We've also switched to "strictly less than" rather
     * than "less than or equal to" because of *handwave* the difference between "endpoints of
     * inclusive ranges" and "Cuts."
     */

   * @throws ArithmeticException if
   *     <ul>
   *       <li>{@code x} is infinite or NaN
   *       <li>{@code x}, after being rounded to a mathematical integer using the specified rounding
   *           mode, is either less than {@code Integer.MIN_VALUE} or greater than {@code
   *           Integer.MAX_VALUE}
   *       <li>{@code x} is not a mathematical integer and {@code mode} is {@link
   *           RoundingMode#UNNECESSARY}
   *     </ul>

   * until a nonzero result is found; imposes "dictionary order." If the end of one iterable is
   * reached, but not the other, the shorter iterable is considered to be less than the longer one.
   * For example, a lexicographical natural ordering over integers considers {@code [] < [1] < [1,
   * 1] < [1, 2] < [2]}.
   *

		if opts.autotune {
			// if we have less drives than concurrency then choose
			// only the concurrency to be number of drives to start
			// with - since default '32' might be big and may not
			// complete in total time of 10s.
			if globalEndpoints.NEndpoints() < concurrency {
				concurrency = globalEndpoints.NEndpoints()
			}

			// Check if we have local disks per pool less than

 */
class PacCredentialTypeTest {

    /**
     * Tests the constructor with a valid byte array.
     */
    @Test
    void testConstructorWithValidData() {
        // A byte array with a length less than 32 should be considered valid.
        byte[] validData = new byte[31];
        assertDoesNotThrow(() -> new PacCredentialType(validData));
    }

    /**