* silently {@link #addNode(Object) add} {@code nodeU} and {@code nodeV} to the graph.
     *
     * @return this {@code Builder} object
     * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the introduction of the edge would violate {@link
     *     #allowsSelfLoops()}
     */
    @CanIgnoreReturnValue
    public Builder<N> putEdge(N nodeU, N nodeV) {
      mutableGraph.putEdge(nodeU, nodeV);
      return this;
    }

    /**

     * silently {@link #addNode(Object) add} {@code nodeU} and {@code nodeV} to the graph.
     *
     * @return this {@code Builder} object
     * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the introduction of the edge would violate {@link
     *     #allowsSelfLoops()}
     */
    @CanIgnoreReturnValue
    public ImmutableValueGraph.Builder<N, V> putEdgeValue(N nodeU, N nodeV, V value) {
      mutableValueGraph.putEdgeValue(nodeU, nodeV, value);

     * silently {@link #addNode(Object) add} {@code nodeU} and {@code nodeV} to the graph.
     *
     * @return this {@code Builder} object
     * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the introduction of the edge would violate {@link
     *     #allowsSelfLoops()}
     */
    @CanIgnoreReturnValue
    public ImmutableValueGraph.Builder<N, V> putEdgeValue(N nodeU, N nodeV, V value) {
      mutableValueGraph.putEdgeValue(nodeU, nodeV, value);

 * natural ordering of the elements, if there is no comparator) to test element equality. As a
 * result, if the comparator is not consistent with equals, some of the standard implementations may
 * violate the {@code Set} contract.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods and the collection views they return are not guaranteed to be
 * thread-safe, even when all of the methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *

 * instances.
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> The comparators or comparables used must be <i>consistent with equals</i> as
 * explained by the {@link Comparable} class specification. Otherwise, the resulting multiset will
 * violate the general contract of {@link SetMultimap}, which is specified in terms of {@link
 * Object#equals}.
 *
 * <p>The collections returned by {@code keySet} and {@code asMap} iterate through the keys

   * level than the whole method but without performing a runtime null check. That way, we can still
   * pass null inputs to LegacyConverter, and it can violate the contract of Converter.
   *
   * TODO(cpovirk): Could this be simplified if we modified implementations of LegacyConverter to
   * override methods (probably called "unsafeDoForward" and "unsafeDoBackward") with the same

 * equivalence of instances.
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> The comparison must be <i>consistent with equals</i> as explained by the
 * {@link Comparable} class specification. Otherwise, the resulting multiset will violate the {@link
 * java.util.Collection} contract, which is specified in terms of {@link Object#equals}.
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a href=

 * equivalence of instances.
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> The comparison must be <i>consistent with equals</i> as explained by the
 * {@link Comparable} class specification. Otherwise, the resulting multiset will violate the {@link
 * java.util.Collection} contract, which is specified in terms of {@link Object#equals}.
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a href=

   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> when this method is used, the resulting cache will use identity ({@code ==})
   * comparison to determine equality of keys. Its {@link Cache#asMap} view will therefore
   * technically violate the {@link Map} specification (in the same way that {@link IdentityHashMap}
   * does).
   *
   * <p>Entries with keys that have been garbage collected may be counted in {@link Cache#size}, but

  }

  public void testCompound_instance() {
    Comparator<String> comparator = byCharAt(1).compound(byCharAt(0));
    testComparator(
        comparator,
        ImmutableList.of("red", "yellow", "violet", "blue", "indigo", "green", "orange"));
  }

  public void testCompound_instance_generics() {
    Ordering<Object> objects = Ordering.explicit((Object) 1);
    Ordering<Number> numbers = Ordering.explicit((Number) 1);