}

    /**
     * Throws {@link UnsupportedOperationException}. This method is inherited from {@link
     * ImmutableMap.Builder}, but it does not make sense for bimaps.
     *
     * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always
     * @deprecated This method does not make sense for bimaps and should not be called.
     * @since 31.1
     */
    @DoNotCall
    @Deprecated
    @Override

            try {
                return send0(loc, request, response, params);
            } catch (final SmbException smbe) {
                // Retrying only makes sense if the invalid parameter is an tree id. If we have a stale file descriptor
                // retrying make no sense, as it will never become available again.
                if (params.contains(RequestParam.NO_RETRY)

 * </ul>
 *
 * <h4>"Interfaces", not implementations</h4>
 *
 * <p>These are classes instead of interfaces to prevent external subtyping, but should be thought
 * of as interfaces in every important sense. Each public class such as {@link ImmutableSet} is a
 * <i>type</i> offering meaningful behavioral guarantees. This is substantially different from the

            if (response != null) {
                response.clearReceived();
            }

            // try TreeConnectAndX with the request
            // this does not make any sense if we are disconnecting right now
            T chainedResponse = null;
            if (!(request instanceof SmbComTreeDisconnect) && !(request instanceof Smb2TreeDisconnectRequest)) {

   * smaller than a large array. (This assumes that in the lazy case, most stripes are unused. As
   * always, if many stripes are in use, a non-lazy striped makes more sense.)
   */
  private static final int LARGE_LAZY_CUTOFF = 1024;

  private Striped() {}

  /**
   * Returns the stripe that corresponds to the passed key. It is always guaranteed that if {@code

                throws CIFSException {
            super(th, parent, wildcard, filter, searchAttributes);
        }

        TestIterator throwOnOpen() {
            // This method doesn't make sense anymore with static approach
            return this;
        }

        TestIterator throwOnFetch() {
            this.throwOnFetch = true;
            return this;
        }

         * don't _want_ our new TypeVariable to be equal to the JDK TypeVariable because it has
         * _different bounds_ than the JDK TypeVariable. And it wouldn't make sense for our new
         * TypeVariable to be equal to any _other_ JDK TypeVariable, either, because any other JDK
         * TypeVariable must have a different declaration or name. The only TypeVariable that our

              <groupId>com.toasttab.android</groupId>
              <artifactId>gummy-bears-api-23</artifactId>
              <version>0.12.0</version>
              <!-- TODO(cpovirk): In principle, it would make sense to *also* test compatibility with JDK 1.8, since guava-android also has JRE users. -->
            </signature>
            <ignores>
              <!-- Unsafe isn't part of the documented Android API, but it is available.

 * </ul>
 *
 * <h4>"Interfaces", not implementations</h4>
 *
 * <p>These are classes instead of interfaces to prevent external subtyping, but should be thought
 * of as interfaces in every important sense. Each public class such as {@link ImmutableSet} is a
 * <i>type</i> offering meaningful behavioral guarantees. This is substantially different from the

         * don't _want_ our new TypeVariable to be equal to the JDK TypeVariable because it has
         * _different bounds_ than the JDK TypeVariable. And it wouldn't make sense for our new
         * TypeVariable to be equal to any _other_ JDK TypeVariable, either, because any other JDK
         * TypeVariable must have a different declaration or name. The only TypeVariable that our