* href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in set(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

        }
        checkExceptionClassValidity(exceptionClass);

        /*
         * It's very unlikely that any loaded Futures class will see getChecked called with more
         * than a handful of exceptions. But it seems prudent to set a cap on how many we'll cache.
         * This avoids out-of-control memory consumption, and it keeps the cache from growing so
         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.

   * AtomicReferenceFieldUpdaterAtomicHelper, which would fail with a similar problem to
   * VarHandleAtomicHelperMaker, forcing us all the way to SynchronizedHelper.
   *
   * Additionally, it seems that nestmates do not help with runtime reflection under *Android*, even
   * when we use a newer -source and -target. That doesn't normally matter for AbstractFutureState,

      <activation>
        <property>
          <name>surefire.toolchain.version</name>
          <!-- the value provided by GitHub CI (which maybe we could even change, but supporting "8" seems nice for any users who try pass that value manually) -->
          <value>8</value>
        </property>
      </activation>
      <properties>
        <test.add.opens></test.add.opens>
      </properties>

      <activation>
        <property>
          <name>surefire.toolchain.version</name>
          <!-- the value provided by GitHub CI (which maybe we could even change, but supporting "8" seems nice for any users who try pass that value manually) -->
          <value>8</value>
        </property>
      </activation>
      <properties>
        <test.add.opens></test.add.opens>
      </properties>

    }

    /*
     * GWT claims to support java.lang.Character's char-classification methods, but it actually only
     * works for ASCII. So for now, assume any non-ASCII characters are valid. The only place this
     * seems to be documented is here:
     * https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/1UEzsryq1XI
     *
     * <p>ASCII characters in the part are expected to be valid per RFC 1035, with underscore also

   * AtomicReferenceFieldUpdaterAtomicHelper, which would fail with a similar problem to
   * VarHandleAtomicHelperMaker, forcing us all the way to SynchronizedHelper.
   *
   * Additionally, it seems that nestmates do not help with runtime reflection under *Android*, even
   * when we use a newer -source and -target. That doesn't normally matter for AbstractFutureState,

tomustam??uzimurat???rih!.&a&ka&n?s??m&ayukuf?i&hsorihihsagih?j&ate?imakikaso????r&a&bohs?h&ekat?im???es??tiak?wiad??e&kato?ruk??i&h&ci&akustah?mono?nihs??s&inares?oyim???manimasa?uk??negokikesnij?o&gnoh?namuk??uhcuf????uk&ot!.&a&bihci?mi&hsu&kot?stamok??m??wagakan??egihsustam?i&gum?h&coganas?soyim??kijaw?m&anim?uzia??ukihsihs??nan&a?iak??o&nati?turan????uf!.&a&batuf?m&a&to?y&enak?irok???ihs&im?ukuf??os?uko??r&aboihsatik?uganat??ta&katik?mawak?rih??w&a&g&akus?emas?uy??k&a&mat?rihs?sa??ihsi??nah?...