: new NonTerminalImmutableMapEntry<K, V>(key, value, keyBucketHead);
        table[tableIndex] = effectiveEntry;
      } else {
        // We already saw this key, and the first value we saw (going backwards) is the one we are
        // keeping. So we won't touch table[], but we do still want to add the existing entry that

    }
    cache.invalidateAll();
    tasksFinished.await();

    // Check all of the removal notifications we received: they should have had correctly-associated
    // keys and values. (An earlier bug saw removal notifications for in-progress computations,
    // which had real keys with null values.)
    Map<String, String> removalNotifications = new HashMap<>();

    }
    cache.invalidateAll();
    tasksFinished.await();

    // Check all of the removal notifications we received: they should have had correctly-associated
    // keys and values. (An earlier bug saw removal notifications for in-progress computations,
    // which had real keys with null values.)
    Map<String, String> removalNotifications = new HashMap<>();

  //
  // The imaginary `hash` and `next` values are combined into a single `int` value in the `entries`
  // array. The top bits of this value are the remaining bits of the hash value that were not used
  // in the short hash. We saw that a mask of 0x7f would keep the 7-bit value 0x6f from a full
  // hashcode of 0x89abcdef. The imaginary `hash` value would then be the remaining top 25 bits,