## Opinions

"_[...] I'm using **FastAPI** a ton these days. [...] I'm actually planning to use it for all of my team's **ML services at Microsoft**. Some of them are getting integrated into the core **Windows** product and some **Office** products._"

<div style="text-align: right; margin-right: 10%;">Kabir Khan - <strong>Microsoft</strong> <a href="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/pull/26" target="_blank"><small>(ref)</small></a></div>

---

   * }
   * }</pre>
   *
   * <p>Note that if any input list is empty, the Cartesian product will also be empty. If no lists
   * at all are provided (an empty list), the resulting Cartesian product has one element, an empty
   * list (counter-intuitive, but mathematically consistent).
   *
   * <p><i>Performance notes:</i> while the cartesian product of lists of size {@code m, n, p} is a

## About security, APIs, and docs

Hiding your documentation user interfaces in production *shouldn't* be the way to protect your API.

That doesn't add any extra security to your API, the *path operations* will still be available where they are.

If there's a security flaw in your code, it will still exist.

"""FastAPI framework, high performance, easy to learn, fast to code, ready for production"""

__version__ = "0.115.4"

from starlette import status as status

from .applications import FastAPI as FastAPI
from .background import BackgroundTasks as BackgroundTasks
from .datastructures import UploadFile as UploadFile
from .exceptions import HTTPException as HTTPException
from .exceptions import WebSocketException as WebSocketException

    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> Sets.newSetFromMap(map));
  }

  /** The 0-ary cartesian product is a single empty list. */
  public void testCartesianProduct_zeroary() {
    assertThat(cartesianProduct()).containsExactly(list());
  }

  /** A unary cartesian product is one list of size 1 for each element in the input set. */
  public void testCartesianProduct_unary() {

In particular access to the security-critical production components (root CA, policy, control)
should be locked down and restricted.  The new installer allows multiple instances of
policy/control/telemetry - so testing/staging of new settings and versions can be performed
by a different role than the prod version.

The intended users of this repo are users running Istio in production who want to select, tune

  }

  public Runnable getTearDown() {
    return tearDown;
  }

  // Features

  private final Set<Feature<?>> features = new LinkedHashSet<>();

  /**
   * Configures this builder to produce tests appropriate for the given features. This method may be
   * called more than once to add features in multiple groups.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public B withFeatures(Feature<?>... features) {

and retrieval of the plugin dependencies so during development we would translate the POMs into dependency information that Mercury can understand, and in production we would have the pre-digested format that Mercury could utilize to resolve and retrieve dependencies. We need to be careful that we are using Mercury during development and production so that we don’t get in the situation where Maven 2.x is resolving differently than Mercury is. We can still leverage POMs during development but we need...

But you can also provide other alternative `servers`, for example if you want *the same* docs UI to interact with both a staging and a production environment.

If you pass a custom list of `servers` and there's a `root_path` (because your API lives behind a proxy), **FastAPI** will insert a "server" with this `root_path` at the beginning of the list.

For example:

    img: https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/sponsors/scalar.svg
  - url: https://www.propelauth.com/?utm_source=fastapi&utm_campaign=1223&utm_medium=mainbadge
    title: Auth, user management and more for your B2B product
    img: https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/sponsors/propelauth.png
  - url: https://www.withcoherence.com/?utm_medium=advertising&utm_source=fastapi&utm_campaign=website
    title: Coherence