* Therefore, we can always create our own TypeVariable.
         *
         * 2. Under the JDK, the built-in TypeVariable implementation does not interoperate with
         * ours. Therefore, we have to be careful about whether we create our own TypeVariable:
         *
         * 2a. If the resolved types are identical to the original types, then we can return the

        }

        in 5..7 -> {
          data.writeByte('\n'.code) // 'data' on a line of its own.
        }

        in 8..9 -> {
          id = source.readUtf8LineStrict().takeIf { it.isNotEmpty() }
        }

        in 10..12 -> {
          id = null // 'id' on a line of its own.
        }

        in 13..14 -> {
          type = source.readUtf8LineStrict().takeIf { it.isNotEmpty() }
        }

   * type. That said, we could *accept* a `@Nullable T[]` (which, given that we treat arrays as
   * covariant, would still permit a plain `T[]`) and return a plain `T[]`. But of course that would
   * require its own suppression, since it is also unsound. toArray(T[]) is just a mess from a
   * nullness perspective. The signature below at least has the virtue of being relatively simple.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness")

 * side of permissiveness and thus avoid spurious rejection of valid sites. Of course, to actually
 * determine addressability of any host, clients of this class will need to perform their own DNS
 * lookups.
 *
 * <p>During construction, names are normalized in two ways:
 *
 * <ol>
 *   <li>ASCII uppercase characters are converted to lowercase.

   * type. That said, we could *accept* a `@Nullable T[]` (which, given that we treat arrays as
   * covariant, would still permit a plain `T[]`) and return a plain `T[]`. But of course that would
   * require its own suppression, since it is also unsound. toArray(T[]) is just a mess from a
   * nullness perspective. The signature below at least has the virtue of being relatively simple.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness")

 * #add(Object, int)} alone <b>will not</b> change the behavior of {@link #add(Object)}, which can
 * lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you should override {@code add(Object)} as well,
 * either providing your own implementation, or delegating to the provided {@code standardAdd}
 * method.
 *
 * <p><b>{@code default} method warning:</b> This class does <i>not</i> forward calls to {@code

         * Therefore, we can always create our own TypeVariable.
         *
         * 2. Under the JDK, the built-in TypeVariable implementation does not interoperate with
         * ours. Therefore, we have to be careful about whether we create our own TypeVariable:
         *
         * 2a. If the resolved types are identical to the original types, then we can return the

 * loading), and fewer <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Apackage%3Dcache+label%3Atype%3Ddefect">bugs</a>.
 *
 * <p>Caffeine defines its own interfaces (<a
 * href="https://www.javadoc.io/doc/com.github.ben-manes.caffeine/caffeine/latest/com.github.benmanes.caffeine/com/github/benmanes/caffeine/cache/Cache.html">{@code
 * Cache}</a>, <a

import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.NavigableSet;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Implementation of {@link Multisets#unmodifiableSortedMultiset(SortedMultiset)}, split out into
 * its own file so it can be GWT emulated (to deal with the differing elementSet() types in GWT and
 * non-GWT).
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible

            assertNull(e.fillInStackTrace());
            assertEquals(0, e.getStackTrace().length);
        }
    }

    public void test_multipleInstances() {
        // Test that multiple instances maintain their own state
        UserRoleLoginException exception1 = new UserRoleLoginException(RootAction.class);
        UserRoleLoginException exception2 = new UserRoleLoginException(RootAction.class);