});
            return redirectToRoot();
        }
    }

    /**
     * Moves to a specific page.
     * @param form The search form.
     * @param move The number of pages to move.
     * @return The HTML response.
     */
    protected HtmlResponse doMove(final SearchForm form, final int move) {
        int start = fessConfig.getPagingSearchPageStartAsInteger();
        if (form.pn != null) {

    public HtmlResponse move(final ListForm form) {
        saveToken();
        return doMove(form, 0);
    }

    /**
     * Handles pagination movement logic.
     *
     * @param form the list form containing current state
     * @param move the direction to move (-1 for previous, 0 for specific page, 1 for next)
     * @return HTML response with moved page results
     */

 * parameter for non-GWT, non-test files, and it didn't seem worth adding one for this unusual case.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullUnmarked
final class LenientSerializableTester {
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): move this to c.g.c.testing if we allow for c.g.c.annotations dependencies so
   * that it can be GWTified?
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @GwtIncompatible // SerializableTester

                                    // ignore
                                }
                                Files.move(path, newPath);
                                logger.info("Move {} to {}", path, newPath);
                            } catch (final IOException e) {
                                logger.warn("Failed to move {}", path, e);
                            }
                        }
                    }
                });

  /*
   * Arrays are a mess from a nullness perspective, and Class instances for object-array types are
   * even worse. For now, we just suppress and move on with our lives.
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/65
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jdk/commit/71d826792b8c7ef95d492c50a274deab938f2552
   */
  /*

  /*
   * Arrays are a mess from a nullness perspective, and Class instances for object-array types are
   * even worse. For now, we just suppress and move on with our lives.
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/65
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jdk/commit/71d826792b8c7ef95d492c50a274deab938f2552
   */
  /*

    }
  }

  /**
   * An {@code Entry} implementation that attempts to follow its key around the map -- that is, if
   * the key is moved, deleted, or reinserted, it will account for that -- while not doing any extra
   * work if the key has not moved. One quirk: The {@link #getValue()} method can return {@code
   * null} even for a map which supposedly does not contain null elements, if the key is not present

    int srcIndex = size() - 1;
    if (dstIndex < srcIndex) {
      // move last entry to deleted spot
      Object key = keys[srcIndex];
      keys[dstIndex] = key;
      values[dstIndex] = values[srcIndex];
      keys[srcIndex] = null;
      values[srcIndex] = null;

      // move the last entry to the removed spot, just like we moved the element
      entries[dstIndex] = entries[srcIndex];
      entries[srcIndex] = 0;

          new NumberFormatException("Error parsing value: " + stringValue);
      decodeException.initCause(e);
      throw decodeException;
    }
  }

  /*
   * We move the static constants into this class so ProGuard can inline UnsignedLongs entirely
   * unless the user is actually calling a parse method.
   */
  private static final class ParseOverflowDetection {

  public static <E> ImmutableSortedSet.Builder<E> builder() {
    throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
  }

  private static final Comparator<?> NATURAL_ORDER = Ordering.natural();

  // TODO(b/345814817): Move this to RegularImmutableSortedSet?
  @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "ClassInitializationDeadlock"})
  private static final ImmutableSortedSet<Object> NATURAL_EMPTY_SET =
      new RegularImmutableSortedSet<Object>(