CONDITIONAL_HOST_MOUNTS+="--mount type=bind,source=${HOME}/.config/gcloud,destination=/config/.config/gcloud,readonly "
fi

# gitconfig conditional host mount (needed for git commands inside container)
if [[ -f "${HOME}/.gitconfig" ]]; then
  CONDITIONAL_HOST_MOUNTS+="--mount type=bind,source=${HOME}/.gitconfig,destination=/home/.gitconfig,readonly "
fi

# .netrc conditional host mount (needed for git commands inside container)

# Static Files

You can serve static files automatically from a directory using `StaticFiles`.

## Use `StaticFiles`

* Import `StaticFiles`.
* "Mount" a `StaticFiles()` instance in a specific path.

{* ../../docs_src/static_files/tutorial001.py hl[2,6] *}

/// note | "Technical Details"

You could also use `from starlette.staticfiles import StaticFiles`.

As of Go 1.23 (`winsymlink=1`), mount points no longer have [`os.ModeSymlink`](/pkg/os#ModeSymlink)
set, and reparse points that are not symlinks, Unix sockets, or dedup files now
always have [`os.ModeIrregular`](/pkg/os#ModeIrregular) set. As a result of these changes,
[`filepath.EvalSymlinks`](/pkg/path/filepath#EvalSymlinks) no longer evaluates
mount points, which was a source of many inconsistencies and bugs.

│   ├── __init__.py
│   ├── main.py
└── static
    ├── redoc.standalone.js
    ├── swagger-ui-bundle.js
    └── swagger-ui.css
```

### Serve the static files

* Import `StaticFiles`.
* "Mount" a `StaticFiles()` instance in a specific path.

{* ../../docs_src/custom_docs_ui/tutorial002.py hl[7,11] *}

### Test the static files

{* ../../docs_src/behind_a_proxy/tutorial004.py hl[9] *}

and then it won't include it in the OpenAPI schema.

## Mounting a sub-application

If you need to mount a sub-application (as described in [Sub Applications - Mounts](sub-applications.md){.internal-link target=_blank}) while also using a proxy with `root_path`, you can do it normally, as you would expect.

- Kubelet now hard rejects pods with AppArmor if the node does not have AppArmor. ([#125776](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/125776), [@vinayakankugoyal](https://github.com/vinayakankugoyal))
- Mount-utils: treated syscall.ENODEV as corrupted mount. ([#126174](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/126174), [@dobsonj](https://github.com/dobsonj))

- Mount-utils: treat syscall.ENODEV as corrupted mount ([#126174](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/126174), [@dobsonj](https://github.com/dobsonj)) [SIG Storage]

- Mount-utils: treat syscall.ENODEV as corrupted mount ([#126174](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/126174), [@dobsonj](https://github.com/dobsonj)) [SIG Storage]

- Mount-utils: treat syscall.ENODEV as corrupted mount ([#126174](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/126174), [@dobsonj](https://github.com/dobsonj)) [SIG Storage]

- Fixed an issue in the kubelet that showed when writeable layers and read-only layers were at different paths within the same mount.
  Kubernetes was previously detecting that the image filesystem was split, even when that was not really the case. ([#126562](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/126562), [@kannon92](https://github.com/kannon92)) [SIG Node]