}

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {

   * by two things.
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>This is only called when a waiting thread times out or is interrupted. Both of which
   *       should be rare.
   *   <li>The waiters list should be very short.
   * </ul>
   */
  private void removeWaiter(Waiter node) {
    node.thread = null; // mark as 'deleted'
    restart:
    while (true) {

    /**
     * Returns a newly-created immutable map, using the last value for any key that was added more
     * than once. The iteration order of the returned map is the order in which entries were
     * inserted into the builder, unless {@link #orderEntriesByValue} was called, in which case
     * entries are sorted by value. If a key was added more than once, it appears in iteration order

            classes that are actually used in the module under test.

            One way to eliminate the warnings is to make base.testModule include the not really
            necessary <inherits> lines for c.g.c.collect.testModule, etc. However, adding <inherits>
            lines could make c.g.c.base.testModule transitively inherit from extra modules. If some

   *     class under test.
   */
  protected abstract Map<K, V> makeEmptyMap() throws UnsupportedOperationException;

  /**
   * Creates a new, non-empty instance of the class under test.
   *
   * @return a new, non-empty map instance.
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException if it's not possible to make a non-empty instance of the
   *     class under test.

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {

   *     always a bug if {@code formal} isn't a type variable and contains no type variable. Make
   *     sure you are passing the two parameters in the right order.
   * @param actual The type that the formal type variable(s) are mapped to. It can be or contain yet
   *     other type variables, in which case these type variables will be further resolved if

   * used for another unchecked exception, an exception during string formatting would serve little
   * purpose except to supplant the real information you were trying to provide. These are the cases
   * this method is made for; it instead generates a best-effort string with all supplied argument
   * values present. This method is also useful in environments such as GWT where {@code

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {