var inconsistent int
	for i, meta := range metaArr {
		if disks[i] == nil {
			// Assuming offline drives as inconsistent,
			// to be safe and fallback to original
			// distribution order.
			inconsistent++
			continue
		}
		if !meta.IsValid() {
			inconsistent++
			continue
		}
		if meta.XLV1 != fi.XLV1 {
			inconsistent++
			continue
		}

- Some Unformatted - format all and return success.
- Any JBOD inconsistent - return failure
- Some are corrupt (missing format.json) - return failure
- Any unrecognized disks - return failure

Some disks are offline and we have quorum.
-----------------
- Some unformatted - format all and return success,
  treat disks offline as corrupted.
- Any JBOD inconsistent - return failure
- Some are corrupt (missing format.json)

        assertTrue(endLatch.await(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS), "All threads should complete");
        executor.shutdown();

        // Then - Session should be in consistent state
        // The double-check pattern should prevent inconsistent cleanup
        assertTrue(releaseCount.get() > 0 || acquireCount.get() > 0, "Release and acquire counts should be processed");
    }

    /**

        // When/Then
        assertDoesNotThrow(() -> {
            PropertyConfiguration testConfig = new PropertyConfiguration(props);
            // Configuration should handle inconsistent min/max versions
            assertNotNull(testConfig.getMinimumVersion());
            assertNotNull(testConfig.getMaximumVersion());
        });
    }

    @Test

            // Both non-null - should be same instance
            assertSame(first, second, "Second getSubject should return same cached instance as first");
        } else {
            fail("Inconsistent behavior: first=" + first + ", second=" + second);
        }

        // Third call should return the same cached Subject instance
        Subject third = auth.getSubject();

	// Check whether uid is still active.
	resource, ok := l.lockUID[formatUUID(args.UID, 0)]
	if !ok {
		return false, nil
	}
	idx := 0
	for {
		lris, ok := l.lockMap[resource]
		if !ok {
			// Inconsistent. Delete UID.
			delete(l.lockUID, formatUUID(args.UID, idx))
			return idx > 0, nil
		}
		now := UTCNow()
		for i := range lris {
			if lris[i].UID == args.UID {
				lris[i].TimeLastRefresh = now.UnixNano()

   * example, {@code [] < [1L] < [1L, 2L] < [2L] < [1L << 63]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(long[],
   * long[])}.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 9+ users:</b> Use {@link Arrays#compareUnsigned(long[], long[])
   * Arrays::compareUnsigned}.

   * copy.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> {@code keyPredicate} must be <i>consistent with equals</i>, as documented at
   * {@link Predicate#apply}. Do not provide a predicate such as {@code
   * Predicates.instanceOf(ArrayList.class)}, which is inconsistent with equals.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */

   * copy.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> {@code keyPredicate} must be <i>consistent with equals</i>, as documented at
   * {@link Predicate#apply}. Do not provide a predicate such as {@code
   * Predicates.instanceOf(ArrayList.class)}, which is inconsistent with equals.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */

replication status is reflected as `PENDING`.

If 3 or more targets are participating in active-active replication, the replication configuration for replica metadata sync, delete marker replication and delete replication should match to avoid inconsistent picture between the clusters. It is not recommended to turn on asymmetric replication - for e.g. if three sites A,B,C are participating in replication, it would be better to avoid replication setups like A -> [B, C], B -> A. In this particular...