*
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> On a file system that supports symbolic links, it is possible for an
   * insecure recursive delete to delete files and directories that are <i>outside</i> the directory
   * being deleted. This can happen if, after checking that a file is a directory (and not a
   * symbolic link), that directory is deleted and replaced by a symbolic link to an outside

   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> On a file system that supports symbolic links, it is possible for an
   * insecure recursive delete to delete files and directories that are <i>outside</i> the directory
   * being deleted. This can happen if, after checking that a file is a directory (and not a
   * symbolic link), that directory is deleted and replaced by a symbolic link to an outside

    // exists and is a symlink to a directory... we'd like for this to succeed in that case.
    // (I'm kind of surprised that createDirectories would fail in that case; doesn't seem like
    // what you'd want to happen.)
    if (!Files.isDirectory(parent)) {
      Files.createDirectories(parent, attrs);
      if (!Files.isDirectory(parent)) {
        throw new IOException("Unable to create parent directories of " + path);
      }

    // exists and is a symlink to a directory... we'd like for this to succeed in that case.
    // (I'm kind of surprised that createDirectories would fail in that case; doesn't seem like
    // what you'd want to happen.)
    if (!Files.isDirectory(parent)) {
      Files.createDirectories(parent, attrs);
      if (!Files.isDirectory(parent)) {
        throw new IOException("Unable to create parent directories of " + path);
      }

/// tip

The `shutdown` would happen when you are **stopping** the application.

Maybe you need to start a new version, or you just got tired of running it. 🤷

///

### Lifespan function

    try {
      in.copyTo(out);
      fail();
    } catch (IOException expected) {
      return expected.getSuppressed().length;
    }
    throw new AssertionError(); // can't happen
  }

  private static CharSource newNormalCharSource() {
    return CharSource.wrap("ABC");
  }

  private static CharSink newNormalCharSink() {
    return new CharSink() {
      @Override

  public void testContainsAll() {
    Range<Integer> range = Range.closed(3, 5);
    assertTrue(range.containsAll(asList(3, 3, 4, 5)));
    assertFalse(range.containsAll(asList(3, 3, 4, 5, 6)));

    // We happen to know that natural-order sorted sets use a different code
    // path, so we test that separately
    assertTrue(range.containsAll(ImmutableSortedSet.of(3, 3, 4, 5)));
    assertTrue(range.containsAll(ImmutableSortedSet.of(3)));

And if you select the scope `me` but not the scope `items`, you will be able to access `/users/me/` but not `/users/me/items/`.

That's what would happen to a third party application that tried to access one of these *path operations* with a token provided by a user, depending on how many permissions the user gave the application.

## About third party integrations

     * pass a literal "null" should probably just use `get`, but I would expect other callers to
     * pass an expression that *might* be null. This could happen with:
     *
     * - a `getFooOrDefault(@CheckForNull Foo defaultValue)` method that returns
     *   `map.getOrDefault(FOO_KEY, defaultValue)`
     *

     * pass a literal "null" should probably just use `get`, but I would expect other callers to
     * pass an expression that *might* be null. This could happen with:
     *
     * - a `getFooOrDefault(@CheckForNull Foo defaultValue)` method that returns
     *   `map.getOrDefault(FOO_KEY, defaultValue)`
     *