@Override
              public Integer call() throws Exception {
                enterLatch.countDown();
                try {
                  new CountDownLatch(1).await(); // wait forever
                  throw new AssertionError();
                } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                  interruptedExceptionThrown.set(true);
                  throw e;
                } finally {

      taskRunner.notify()
    }

    /**
     * Wait a duration in nanoseconds. Unlike [java.lang.Object.wait] this interprets 0 as
     * "don't wait" instead of "wait forever".
     */
    @Throws(InterruptedException::class)
    @Suppress("PLATFORM_CLASS_MAPPED_TO_KOTLIN")
    override fun coordinatorWait(
      taskRunner: TaskRunner,
      nanos: Long,
    ) {

            ContiguousSet.closedOpen(Integer.MIN_VALUE, Integer.MIN_VALUE),
            ImmutableSortedSet.of(),
            ImmutableSet.of())
        .testEquals();
    // not testing hashCode for these because it takes forever to compute
    assertEquals(
        ContiguousSet.closed(Integer.MIN_VALUE, Integer.MAX_VALUE),
        ContiguousSet.create(Range.<Integer>all(), integers()));
    assertEquals(

  private var expectMoreExchanges = true

  // These properties are accessed by canceling threads. Any thread can cancel a call, and once it's
  // canceled it's canceled forever.

  @Volatile private var canceled = false

  @Volatile private var exchange: Exchange? = null
  internal val plansToCancel = CopyOnWriteArrayList<RoutePlanner.Plan>()

            ContiguousSet.closedOpen(Integer.MIN_VALUE, Integer.MIN_VALUE),
            ImmutableSortedSet.of(),
            ImmutableSet.of())
        .testEquals();
    // not testing hashCode for these because it takes forever to compute
    assertEquals(
        ContiguousSet.closed(Integer.MIN_VALUE, Integer.MAX_VALUE),
        ContiguousSet.create(Range.<Integer>all(), integers()));
    assertEquals(

   * symmetry. Moreover, we don't want to reconstruct a native type variable {@code <A>} using our
   * implementation unless some of its bounds have changed in resolution. This avoids creating
   * unequal TypeVariable implementation unnecessarily. When the bounds do change, however, it's
   * fine for the synthetic TypeVariable to be unequal to any native TypeVariable anyway.

   * symmetry. Moreover, we don't want to reconstruct a native type variable {@code <A>} using our
   * implementation unless some of its bounds have changed in resolution. This avoids creating
   * unequal TypeVariable implementation unnecessarily. When the bounds do change, however, it's
   * fine for the synthetic TypeVariable to be unequal to any native TypeVariable anyway.

       *
       * My impression is that an AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater in a static field is similarly fast to
       * Unsafe on modern JVMs (if perhaps not quite as fast as VarHandle?). However, I'm not sure
       * exactly what we've benchmarked, and we certainly haven't benchmarked as far back as JDK 8.
       * (We also haven't benchmarked under Android. We continue to use UnsafeAtomicHelper there so

   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.
   */

 * {@code asMap} has a few subtleties. As long as the set of keys remains unchanged, adding or
 * removing mappings does not affect the key iteration order. However, if you remove all values
 * associated with a key and then add the key back to the multimap, that key will come last in the
 * key iteration order.
 *