Le fast-food a 8 processeurs (serveurs/cuisiniers) 👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳. Alors que le fast-food de burgers concurrents en avait 2 (un serveur et un cuisinier).

Et pourtant l'expérience finale n'est pas meilleure 😞.

---

### Burger Conclusion { #burger-conclusion }

In this scenario of "fast food burgers with your crush", as there is a lot of waiting 🕙, it makes a lot more sense to have a concurrent system ⏸🔀⏯.

This is the case for most of the web applications.

Many, many users, but your server is waiting 🕙 for their not-so-good connection to send their requests.

And then waiting 🕙 again for the responses to come back.

### Parallele Hamburger

Stellen wir uns jetzt vor, dass es sich hierbei nicht um „nebenläufige Hamburger“, sondern um „parallele Hamburger“ handelt.

Sie gehen los mit Ihrem Schwarm, um paralleles Fast Food zu bekommen.

Sie stehen in der Schlange, während mehrere (sagen wir acht) Kassierer, die gleichzeitig Köche sind, die Bestellungen der Leute vor Ihnen entgegennehmen.

Ve uzun süre kuyrukta beklemek 🕙 zorundasın yoksa sıranı kaybedersin.

Muhtemelen ayak işlerı yaparken sevgilini 😍 bankaya 🏦 getirmezsin.

### Burger Sonucu

Bu "aşkınla fast food burgerleri" senaryosunda, çok fazla bekleme olduğu için 🕙, eşzamanlı bir sisteme sahip olmak çok daha mantıklı ⏸🔀⏯.

Web uygulamalarının çoğu için durum böyledir.

   *
   * <p>For example:
   *
   * {@snippet :
   * Streams.zip(
   *   Stream.of("foo1", "foo2", "foo3"),
   *   Stream.of("bar1", "bar2"),
   *   (arg1, arg2) -> arg1 + ":" + arg2)
   * }
   *
   * <p>will return {@code Stream.of("foo1:bar1", "foo2:bar2")}.
   *
   * <p>The resulting stream will only be as long as the shorter of the two input streams; if one

So, if you run this example and go to <a href="http://127.0.0.1:8000/items/foo" class="external-link" target="_blank">http://127.0.0.1:8000/items/foo</a>, you will see a response of:

```JSON
{"item_id":"foo"}
```

## Path parameters with types { #path-parameters-with-types }

And it shows their true commitment to FastAPI and its **community** (you), as they not only want to provide you a **good service** but also want to make sure you have a **good and healthy framework**, FastAPI. 🙇

You might want to try their services and follow their guides:

    tester.forAllPublicStaticMethods(GoodSerializableFactory.class).testSerializable();
  }

  public static final class GoodSerializableFactory {
    public static Object good(Runnable r) {
      return r;
    }

    public static Object good(AnInterface i) {
      return i;
    }

    private GoodSerializableFactory() {}
  }

  public void testSerializableOnReturnValues_bad() throws Exception {

                 * be cached and cause other types to fail even though they may
                 * not be the authority for the name. For example, if a WINS lookup
                 * for FOO fails and caches unknownAddress for FOO, a subsequent
                 * lookup for FOO using BCAST should not fail because of that
                 * name cached from WINS.
                 *

For example, if the client tries to send a `santa_tracker` cookie with a value of `good-list-please`, the client will receive an **error** response telling them that the `santa_tracker` <abbr title="Santa disapproves the lack of cookies. 🎅 Okay, no more cookie jokes.">cookie is not allowed</abbr>:

```json
{