public void test_addChain_single() {
        TestAuthenticationChain chain = new TestAuthenticationChain();
        authenticationManager.addChain(chain);

        // Verify chain was added by testing its effect
        User user = createTestUser("testuser");
        authenticationManager.insert(user);
        assertEquals(1, chain.updateCallCount);
    }

    // Test addChain multiple

   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public long put(K key, long newValue) {
    return getAndUpdate(key, x -> newValue);
  }

  /**
   * Copies all of the mappings from the specified map to this map. The effect of this call is
   * equivalent to that of calling {@code put(k, v)} on this map once for each mapping from key
   * {@code k} to value {@code v} in the specified map. The behavior of this operation is undefined

   * method is intrinsically racy, it should only be used when it is known that no threads are
   * concurrently updating.
   */
  public void reset() {
    internalReset(0L);
  }

  /**
   * Equivalent in effect to {@link #sum} followed by {@link #reset}. This method may apply for
   * example during quiescent points between multithreaded computations. If there are updates

  }

  /**
   * {@link Collection#toArray(Object[])} says: "Note that {@code toArray(new Object[0])} is
   * identical in function to {@code toArray()}."
   *
   * <p>For maximum effect, the collection under test should be created from an element array of a
   * type other than {@code Object[]}.
   */
  public void testToArray_isPlainObjectArray() {
    Object[] array = collection.toArray();

   * value} before proceeding with the {@link #put} operation. If the bimap previously contained the
   * provided key-value mapping, this method has no effect.
   *
   * <p>Note that a successful call to this method could cause the size of the bimap to increase by
   * one, stay the same, or even decrease by one.
   *

   * trouble than just using Object.class.)
   *
   * Then we declare the getters for these fields as @GwtIncompatible so that no one can try to use
   * them under J2CL—or, as an unfortunate side effect, under GWT. We do still give the fields
   * themselves their proper values under GWT, since GWT's EnumMap does need the Class instance.
   *

   * value} before proceeding with the {@link #put} operation. If the bimap previously contained the
   * provided key-value mapping, this method has no effect.
   *
   * <p>Note that a successful call to this method could cause the size of the bimap to increase by
   * one, stay the same, or even decrease by one.
   *

 * removing mappings does not affect the key iteration order. However, if you remove all values
 * associated with a key and then add the key back to the multimap, that key will come last in the
 * key iteration order.
 *
 * <p>The multimap does not store duplicate key-value pairs. Adding a new key-value pair equal to an
 * existing key-value pair has no effect.
 *

    rateLimiter.setRate(2.0); // update the rate!

    rateLimiter.acquire(1); // R1.00, to repay previous (the previous was under the old rate!)
    rateLimiter.acquire(2); // R0.50, to repay previous (now the rate takes effect)
    rateLimiter.acquire(4); // R1.00, to repay previous
    rateLimiter.acquire(1); // R2.00, to repay previous
    assertEvents("R0.00", "R1.00", "R1.00", "R0.50", "R1.00", "R2.00");
  }

    rateLimiter.setRate(2.0); // update the rate!

    rateLimiter.acquire(1); // R1.00, to repay previous (the previous was under the old rate!)
    rateLimiter.acquire(2); // R0.50, to repay previous (now the rate takes effect)
    rateLimiter.acquire(4); // R1.00, to repay previous
    rateLimiter.acquire(1); // R2.00, to repay previous
    assertEvents("R0.00", "R1.00", "R1.00", "R0.50", "R1.00", "R2.00");
  }