// forward map ordered by currency (even for country values)
    assertThat(bimap.values()).containsExactly(Country.SWITZERLAND, Country.CHILE).inOrder();
    // backward map ordered by country
    assertThat(bimap.inverse().keySet())
        .containsExactly(Country.CHILE, Country.SWITZERLAND)
        .inOrder();
    // backward map ordered by country (even for currency values)

    // forward map ordered by currency (even for country values)
    assertThat(bimap.values()).containsExactly(Country.SWITZERLAND, Country.CHILE).inOrder();
    // backward map ordered by country
    assertThat(bimap.inverse().keySet())
        .containsExactly(Country.CHILE, Country.SWITZERLAND)
        .inOrder();
    // backward map ordered by country (even for currency values)

            0.03,
            BloomFilterStrategies.MURMUR128_MITZ_32);

    // Insert "numInsertions" even numbers into the BF.
    for (int i = 0; i < numInsertions * 2; i += 2) {
      bf.put(Integer.toString(i));
    }
    assertApproximateElementCountGuess(bf, numInsertions);

    // Assert that the BF "might" have all of the even numbers.
    for (int i = 0; i < numInsertions * 2; i += 2) {

        String result1 = aggregateLogJob.execute();
        assertEquals("", result1);

        // Second call (even) should fail
        String result2 = aggregateLogJob.execute();
        assertTrue(result2.contains("Even call error"));

        // Third call (odd) should succeed
        String result3 = aggregateLogJob.execute();
        assertEquals("", result3);
    }

            0.03,
            BloomFilterStrategies.MURMUR128_MITZ_32);

    // Insert "numInsertions" even numbers into the BF.
    for (int i = 0; i < numInsertions * 2; i += 2) {
      bf.put(Integer.toString(i));
    }
    assertApproximateElementCountGuess(bf, numInsertions);

    // Assert that the BF "might" have all of the even numbers.
    for (int i = 0; i < numInsertions * 2; i += 2) {

  // Use fewer steps in the ListIteratorTester in ListListIteratorTester because it's slow in prod
  // mode.
  static int listListIteratorTesterNumIterations() {
    // TODO(hhchan): It's 4 in java.  Figure out why even 3 is too slow in prod mode.
    return 2;
  }

  // Use fewer steps in the IteratorTester in CollectionIteratorTester because it's slow in prod
  // mode.
  static int collectionIteratorTesterNumIterations() {

      putNext(this, next);
    }

    void unpark() {
      // This is racy with removeWaiter. The consequence of the race is that we may spuriously call
      // unpark even though the thread has already removed itself from the list. But even if we did
      // use a CAS, that race would still exist (it would just be ever so slightly smaller).
      Thread w = thread;
      if (w != null) {
        thread = null;

      putNext(this, next);
    }

    void unpark() {
      // This is racy with removeWaiter. The consequence of the race is that we may spuriously call
      // unpark even though the thread has already removed itself from the list. But even if we did
      // use a CAS, that race would still exist (it would just be ever so slightly smaller).
      Thread w = thread;
      if (w != null) {
        thread = null;

    }

    // Test insert with no chains
    public void test_insert_noChains() {
        User user = createTestUser("testuser");
        authenticationManager.insert(user);
        // Should not throw exception even with no chains
    }

    // Test insert with single chain
    public void test_insert_singleChain() {
        User user = createTestUser("testuser");
        TestAuthenticationChain chain = new TestAuthenticationChain();

   *
   * @param reference any array of the desired type
   * @param length the length of the new array
   */
  /*
   * The new array contains nulls, even if the old array did not. If we wanted to be accurate, we
   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard