computationLatch.countDown();
    // let some computations complete
    while (computedCount.get() < nThreads) {
      Thread.yield();
    }
    cache.invalidateAll();
    tasksFinished.await();

    // Check all of the removal notifications we received: they should have had correctly-associated
    // keys and values. (An earlier bug saw removal notifications for in-progress computations,
    // which had real keys with null values.)

    computationLatch.countDown();
    // let some computations complete
    while (computedCount.get() < nThreads) {
      Thread.yield();
    }
    cache.invalidateAll();
    tasksFinished.await();

    // Check all of the removal notifications we received: they should have had correctly-associated
    // keys and values. (An earlier bug saw removal notifications for in-progress computations,
    // which had real keys with null values.)

  public void reset() {
    internalReset(0L);
  }

  /**
   * Equivalent in effect to {@link #sum} followed by {@link #reset}. This method may apply for
   * example during quiescent points between multithreaded computations. If there are updates
   * concurrent with this method, the returned value is not guaranteed to be the final
   * value occurring before the reset.
   *
   * @return the sum
   */

    int numActions = 100;
    // hashcodes from non-overlapping hash computations
    HashCode expected1 = randomHash(hashFunction, new Random(1L), numActions);
    HashCode expected2 = randomHash(hashFunction, new Random(2L), numActions);

    // equivalent, but overlapping, computations (should produce the same results as above)
    Random random1 = new Random(1L);
    Random random2 = new Random(2L);

Those worker processes would be the ones running your application, they would perform the main computations to receive a **request** and return a **response**, and they would load anything you put in variables in RAM.

<img src="/img/deployment/concepts/process-ram.drawio.svg">

   * usually have much noticeable impact. A value of one permits only one thread to modify the cache
   * at a time, but since read operations and cache loading computations can proceed concurrently,
   * this still yields higher concurrency than full synchronization.
   *
   * <p>Defaults to 4. <b>Note:</b>The default may change in the future. If you care about this

      }
    }.start();

    getStartedSignal.await();

    // computation is in progress; asMap shouldn't have changed
    assertEquals(1, map.size());
    assertFalse(map.containsKey(getKey));
    assertSame(refreshKey, map.get(refreshKey));

    // let computation complete
    letGetFinishSignal.countDown();
    getFinishedSignal.await();
    checkNothingLogged();

   *   <li>To get uninterruptibility and remove checked exceptions, use {@link
   *       Futures#getUnchecked}.
   * </ul>
   *
   * @throws ExecutionException if the computation threw an exception
   * @throws CancellationException if the computation was cancelled
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @ParametricNullness
  public static <V extends @Nullable Object> V getUninterruptibly(Future<V> future)

But right at the moment Python compares the first `j` in `johndoe` to the first `s` in `stanleyjobson`, it will return `False`, because it already knows that those two strings are not the same, thinking that "there's no need to waste more computation comparing the rest of the letters". And your application will say "Incorrect username or password".

But then the attackers try with username `stanleyjobsox` and password `love123`.

   * computation is {@linkplain java.util.concurrent.Future#isDone() complete} or, if the
   * computation is already complete, immediately.
   *
   * <p>The callback is run on {@code executor}. There is no guaranteed ordering of execution of
   * callbacks, but any callback added through this method is guaranteed to be called once the
   * computation is complete.
   *
   * <p>Example:
   *