assertEquals( Artifact.SCOPE_COMPILE, artifact.getScope(), "dependency artifact has wrong scope." );

        //check for back-propagation of default scope.
        assertEquals( Artifact.SCOPE_COMPILE, dep.getScope(), "default scope NOT back-propagated to dependency." );
        */
    }

    @Test
    @Disabled
    void testShouldUseInjectedTestScopeFromDependencyManagement() throws Exception {

    RateLimiter limiter = RateLimiter.create(2.0, 4000, MILLISECONDS, 3.0, stopwatch);
    for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
      limiter.acquire(); // // #1
    }
    stopwatch.sleepMillis(4500); // #2: back to cold state (warmup period + repay last acquire)
    for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { // only three steps, we're somewhere in the warmup period
      limiter.acquire(); // #3
    }

    RateLimiter limiter = RateLimiter.create(2.0, 4000, MILLISECONDS, 3.0, stopwatch);
    for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
      limiter.acquire(); // // #1
    }
    stopwatch.sleepMillis(4500); // #2: back to cold state (warmup period + repay last acquire)
    for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { // only three steps, we're somewhere in the warmup period
      limiter.acquire(); // #3
    }

     * information that is available at the point the problem occurs and as such merely serves as best effort
     * to provide information to the user to track the problem back to its origin.
     *
     * @return The hint about the source of the problem or an empty string if unknown, never {@code null}.
     */
    String getSource();

    /**

# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
# ==============================================================================

name: Creates a GitHub Issue when a PR Rolled back via Commit to Master
on:
  push:
    branches:
      - master
      
permissions: {}

jobs:
  create-issue-on-pr-rollback:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    permissions:
      contents: read

     * creator of the problem, the general expectation is that the hint provides sufficient information to the user to
     * track the problem back to its origin. A concrete example for such a source hint can be the file path or URL from
     * which the settings were read.
     *

/// tip

The *path operation* for `swagger_ui_redirect` is a helper for when you use OAuth2.

If you integrate your API with an OAuth2 provider, you will be able to authenticate and come back to the API docs with the acquired credentials. And interact with it using the real OAuth2 authentication.

Swagger UI will handle it behind the scenes for you, but it needs this "redirect" helper.

///

        return (null == hint
                ? getLoggerForComponent(role)
                : new Slf4jLogger(loggerFactory.getLogger(role + '.' + hint)));
    }

    //
    // Trying to give loggers back is a bad idea. Ceki said so :-)
    // notice to self: what was this method supposed to do?
    //
    /**
     * <b>Warning</b>: ignored.
     */
    public void returnComponentLogger(String role) {}

    /**

						</div>
					</div>
					<div class="text-center">
						<la:link href="/"
							styleClass="btn btn-default">
							<em class="fa fa-arrow-circle-left">
							<la:message key="labels.profile.back" />
						</la:link>
						<button type="submit" name="changePassword"
							class="btn btn-success"
							value="<la:message key="labels.profile.update"/>">
							<em class="fa fa-pencil-alt">

     * creator of the problem, the general expectation is that the hint provides sufficient information to the user to
     * track the problem back to its origin. A concrete example for such a source hint can be the file path or URL from
     * which the settings were read.
     *