+ aggregateAboveRange(aggr, node.left);
    }
  }

  @Override
  public int size() {
    return Ints.saturatedCast(aggregateForEntries(Aggregate.SIZE));
  }

  @Override
  int distinctElements() {
    return Ints.saturatedCast(aggregateForEntries(Aggregate.DISTINCT));
  }

  static int distinctElements(@Nullable AvlNode<?> node) {
    return (node == null) ? 0 : node.distinctElements;
  }

          + aggregateAboveRange(aggr, node.left);
    }
  }

  @Override
  public int size() {
    return Ints.saturatedCast(aggregateForEntries(Aggregate.SIZE));
  }

  @Override
  int distinctElements() {
    return Ints.saturatedCast(aggregateForEntries(Aggregate.DISTINCT));
  }

  static int distinctElements(@Nullable AvlNode<?> node) {
    return (node == null) ? 0 : node.distinctElements;
  }

            try {
                c.accept(pluginDescriptor);
            } catch (IllegalStateException e) {
                prerequisiteExceptions.add(e);
            }
        });
        // aggregate all exceptions
        if (!prerequisiteExceptions.isEmpty()) {
            String messages = prerequisiteExceptions.stream()
                    .map(IllegalStateException::getMessage)

                scenario("Selected aggregator project (including child modules)")
                        .activeRequiredProjects(MODULE_C)
                        .expectResult(MODULE_C, MODULE_C_1, MODULE_C_2),
                scenario("Selected aggregator project with non-recursive")
                        .activeRequiredProjects(MODULE_C)

 * called the <dfn>aggregator project</dfn> lists one or more <dfn>sub-projects</dfn>
 * which are relative pointers on the file system to other projects. This is done using
 * the {@code /project/subprojects/subproject} elements of the POM in the aggregator project.
 * Note that the aggregator project is required to have a {@code pom} packaging.</p>
 *

* Tampoco te preocupes por las reglas de estilo, hay herramientas automatizadas verificando eso.

Y si hay alguna otra necesidad de estilo o consistencia, pediré directamente eso, o agregaré commits encima con los cambios necesarios.

### Revisa el código { #check-the-code }

* Revisa y lee el código, ve si tiene sentido, **ejecútalo localmente** y ve si realmente resuelve el problema.

- When proxying to an aggregated API server, kube-apiserver used the
  `EndpointSlices` of the `service` indicated by the `APIServer`, rather than
  using Endpoints.
  
  If you were using the aggregated API server feature, and you were writing out
  the endpoints for it by hand (rather than letting kube-controller-manager

- Removed the `KUBECTL_OPENAPIV3_PATCH` environment variable, as aggregated discovery has been stable since `v1.30`. ([#134130](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/134130), [@ardaguclu](https://github.com/ardaguclu))

- The `RemoteRequestHeaderUID` feature moves to beta and is now enabled by default. This makes the kube-apiserver propagate UIDs in the `X-Remote-Uid` header in requests to the aggregated API servers. The header is not honored by default for incoming requests, but that can be enabled by setting the `--requestheader-uid-headers` flag explicitly. ([#130560](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/130560), [@stlaz](https://github.com/stlaz))...

- Added: Log Line for Debugging possible merge errors for kubelet related Config requests. ([#124389](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/124389), [@holgerson97](https://github.com/holgerson97))
- Aggregated Discovery v2beta1 fixture is removed in `./api/discovery`. Please use v2 ([#127008](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/127008), [@Jefftree](https://github.com/Jefftree)) [SIG API Machinery]