@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    Scenario<T> starter = new Scenario<>((Ordering<T>) ordering, list, emptyArray);
    verifyScenario(starter, 0);
  }

  private static <T extends @Nullable Object> void verifyScenario(Scenario<T> scenario, int level) {
    scenario.testCompareTo();
    scenario.testIsOrdered();
    scenario.testMinAndMax();
    scenario.testBinarySearch();
    scenario.testSortedCopy();

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    Scenario<T> starter = new Scenario<>((Ordering<T>) ordering, list, emptyArray);
    verifyScenario(starter, 0);
  }

  private static <T extends @Nullable Object> void verifyScenario(Scenario<T> scenario, int level) {
    scenario.testCompareTo();
    scenario.testIsOrdered();
    scenario.testMinAndMax();
    scenario.testBinarySearch();
    scenario.testSortedCopy();

     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a2n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0

     * Tests that <code>a:1.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0

     * Tests that <code>a:1.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0

     * Tests that <code>a:1.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:1.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0

import org.eclipse.aether.transfer.TransferResource;

/**
 * Console download progress meter.
 * <p>
 * This listener is not thread-safe and should be wrapped in the {@link SimplexTransferListener} in a multi-threaded scenario.
 */
public class ConsoleMavenTransferListener extends AbstractMavenTransferListener {

    private final Map<TransferResourceIdentifier, TransferResourceAndSize> transfers = new LinkedHashMap<>();

        if (!process.isEmpty()) {
            if (!restrictions.isEmpty()) {
                throw new InvalidVersionSpecificationException(
                        "Only fully-qualified sets allowed in multiple set scenario: " + spec);
            } else {
                version = new DefaultArtifactVersion(process);
                restrictions.add(Restriction.EVERYTHING);
            }
        }

	m, ok := isObjectDangling(metaArr, errs, dataErrsByPart)
	if !ok {
		// We only come here if we cannot figure out if the object
		// can be deleted safely, in such a scenario return ReadQuorum error.
		return FileInfo{}, errErasureReadQuorum
	}
	tags := make(map[string]string, 16)
	tags["set"] = strconv.Itoa(er.setIndex)
	tags["pool"] = strconv.Itoa(er.poolIndex)

        // have a model that is suitable, yet more checks are done here and the one for the version is problematic
        // before because with parents as ranges it will never work in this scenario.
        //

        String groupId = getGroupId(candidateModel);
        String artifactId = candidateModel.getArtifactId();

        if (groupId == null