ticker.advance(1, MILLISECONDS);
    assertThat(keySet).containsExactly(3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0);

    // asMap.put saves 3
    cache.asMap().put(3, -3);
    ticker.advance(1, MILLISECONDS);
    assertThat(keySet).containsExactly(4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0, 3);

    // asMap.replace saves 4
    cache.asMap().replace(4, -4);
    ticker.advance(1, MILLISECONDS);
    assertThat(keySet).containsExactly(5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0, 3, 4);

                .map(token -> ADMIN_SERVER + token)
                .orElseThrow(() -> new FessSystemException("Cannot create an access token."));
    }

    /**
     * Generates and saves a new access token for the current session.
     * The token is used to authenticate API requests.
     */
    public void saveToken() {

        }
      };

  public void testAnyAndNone_logicalOps() throws Exception {
    // These are testing behavior that's never promised by the API, but since
    // we're lucky enough that these do pass, it saves us from having to write
    // more excruciating tests! Hooray!

    assertThat(CharMatcher.none().negate()).isSameInstanceAs(CharMatcher.any());
    assertThat(CharMatcher.any().negate()).isSameInstanceAs(CharMatcher.none());

   * This is because the {@code forTree()}-based implementations don't keep track of visited nodes,
   * and therefore don't need to call {@code equals()} or {@code hashCode()} on the node objects;
   * this saves both time and space versus traversing the same graph using {@code forGraph()}.
   *
   * <p>Providing a graph to be traversed for which there is more than one path from the start
   * node(s) to any node may lead to:
   *

        .addEqualityGroup(Collections.reverseOrder())
        .testEquals();
  }

  public void testReverseOfReverseSameAsForward() {
    // Not guaranteed by spec, but it works, and saves us from testing
    // exhaustively
    assertThat(numberOrdering.reverse().reverse()).isSameInstanceAs(numberOrdering);
  }

  private enum StringLengthFunction implements Function<String, Integer> {

        .addEqualityGroup(Collections.reverseOrder())
        .testEquals();
  }

  public void testReverseOfReverseSameAsForward() {
    // Not guaranteed by spec, but it works, and saves us from testing
    // exhaustively
    assertThat(numberOrdering.reverse().reverse()).isSameInstanceAs(numberOrdering);
  }

  private enum StringLengthFunction implements Function<String, Integer> {

    /** Gets the key for this entry. */
    K getKey();

    /** Gets the value for the entry. */
    V getValue();
  }

  /*
   * Note: the following classes have a lot of duplicate code. It sucks, but it saves a lot of
   * memory. If only Java had mixins!
   */

  /** Base class for {@link InternalEntry} implementations for strong keys. */
  abstract static class AbstractStrongKeyEntry<K, V, E extends InternalEntry<K, V, E>>

    /** Gets the key for this entry. */
    K getKey();

    /** Gets the value for the entry. */
    V getValue();
  }

  /*
   * Note: the following classes have a lot of duplicate code. It sucks, but it saves a lot of
   * memory. If only Java had mixins!
   */

  /** Base class for {@link InternalEntry} implementations for strong keys. */
  abstract static class AbstractStrongKeyEntry<K, V, E extends InternalEntry<K, V, E>>

* `tf.data`
    * Add optional `synchronous` argument to `map`, to specify that the `map` should run synchronously, as opposed to be parallelizable when `options.experimental_optimization.map_parallelization=True`. This saves memory compared to setting `num_parallel_calls=1`.

  static <E> Queue<E> discardingQueue() {
    return (Queue) DISCARDING_QUEUE;
  }

  /*
   * Note: All of this duplicate code sucks, but it saves a lot of memory. If only Java had mixins!
   * To maintain this code, make a change for the strong reference type. Then, cut and paste, and